-
danmcc said...
The alleged crime for Curley and Shultz is perjury. They committed perjury during grand jury testimony which I'm guessing is within the last 2 years. So is the SOL on the actual crime they lied about or the time of the actual lie?
You find out life's this game of inches, so is football. Because in either game, life or football-the margin for error is so small. -Pacino
tmaluchnik
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1960 votes total - is a "Fighter"
- (2857)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Lions247 only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6534 votes total - (12267)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6534 votes total - (12267)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6534 votes total - (12267)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Lions247 only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6534 votes total - (12267)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
mad4psu said...
If what you are saying is that it's possible to have a "typo" to explain being off by a year, I will give you that - sorta.
Remember, Corbett had been working on this for several years but opted to wait until after he was elected governor and to have his appointed replacement bring the charges. The numbers of legal eyes that were on this before the filing of the actual charges plus the volumes of research by the the Patriot-News makes it mind-numbing to think about the magnitude of this screw-up.
Once that story was published (not the one where Sandusky was charged, but the one earlier in the year), someone in the AG's office someone in that office should have read it and said "Hold it!" "The dates are all wrong in this story!!"
The most upsetting thing about this is that IF the case dies as a result, it may be that MANY lives have been ruined without cause. (Not alluding to the kids, BTW.) And now, the additional screw-up linked in warner3398's post. OMG!!
This post was edited by shavisimo2 on 5/8/2012 at 3:27 PM
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6534 votes total - (12267)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Lions247 only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial
-
shavisimo2 said...
My possibility was this - the backbone of the specific incident was McQueary's story (since they hadn't identified a victim). Maybe he told the AG 2002 by accident and meant 2001. Then maybe everyone else when prompted by questioning was asked "what happened in 2002" and nobody ever thought about it being 2002 or 2001, so the 2002 mistake slipped through the cracks. Who knows.
The Febraury 9th vs. the Friday before spring break in March is the much more confusing part to me. That makes MM's testimony just wildly inconsistent.
Either way, we're on the same page with this being completely botched at the AG's office in many ways.
-
helpdesk said...
If someone asks you "Do you remember in Feb/March of '02 when MM came to you with a concern regarding Jerry Sandusky?" is the first thing that pops into your mind, "No, that was 2001" or "Yes, I remember talking to MM."? I see how the year slips through initially, but by the time you get to the point you are ready to press charges you should have some evidence to support the date you are putting into the charges.
-
helpdesk said...
If someone asks you "Do you remember in Feb/March of '02 when MM came to you with a concern regarding Jerry Sandusky?" is the first thing that pops into your mind, "No, that was 2001" or "Yes, I remember talking to MM."? I see how the year slips through initially, but by the time you get to the point you are ready to press charges you should have some evidence to support the date you are putting into the charges.
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6534 votes total - (12267)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5







Wrong date-2001