Online Now 1262

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 788
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 1143
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell and swap tickets

Reply

With all this talk about...

  • I dont disagree with anyone's opinions, but you have to remember, Joe is going to have A LOT to do with the next coach being hired. That's why I believe it will be in house.
    If not in house, an alumni like Golden will be the next option.

    signature image

    "People ask me why I stayed here so long, Look around, Look around, I stay here because I love you all" R.I.P. Joe - 12/21/1926-01/22/2012

    arch1102

  • tdiddy, I'd still like to see LJ stay around. That was my response to who would you like?

    I'd be OK with keeping Big Red around also. I'd get a young aggressive head coach...hence Harbaugh, Ferentz or Golden, say goodbye to Galen Hall, Jay, Anderson.

    I think there may be a complete overall planned- and maybe after this season. Again- that's why I hope there is no succession plan being announced. I doubt it makes sense to tell the current coaches that their jobs are in jeopardy.

    If Bradley is the next head coach, I would support him, but I'd be pissed that they didn't announce that plan earlier (like Jumbo Fisher for FSU).

    PSUGrad91

  • I'm surprised so many people would be sold on Chris Petersen as coach. He wasn't handed a middling Boise State team - Dan Hawkins led that team to a 53-11 record over 5 years (8-4, 12-1, 13-1, 11-1, 9-4). Now Hawkins is 19-34 with Colorado. I like what Petersen has done at Boise State, but I certainly wouldn't assume that his success will translate that easily.

    For out of house candidates, I have to think that Ferentz, Fitzgerald, and Harbaugh are three of the top choices for a lot of people. Not sure about Mike Stoops, don't really know enough about him, though Arizona has done decently the last couple of years.

    I'm sure sneakypete will get on my case, but I'm not sure Bradley would be that horrible of an option. I know our defense has had its problems, but most of the time our offense is the real issue. The only time I can remember our offense not being the main problem is possibly against USC - but even then a few turnovers were very costly.

    From what Sean has said about the coaches clashing in-house, I'd like to imagine that Bradley might clean house for the offense, somewhat. Get rid of the guys who aren't pulling their weight and bring in some others. Bradley may keep the status quo, but I don't know if that's a guarantee.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • PSUGrad91 said...

    tdiddy, I'd still like to see LJ stay around. That was my response to who would you like?

    I'd be OK with keeping Big Red around also. I'd get a young aggressive head coach...hence Harbaugh, Ferentz or Golden, say goodbye to Galen Hall, Jay, Anderson.

    I think there may be a complete overall planned- and maybe after this season. Again- that's why I hope there is no succession plan being announced. I doubt it makes sense to tell the current coaches that their jobs are in jeopardy.

    If Bradley is the next head coach, I would support him, but I'd be pissed that they didn't announce that plan earlier (like Jumbo Fisher for FSU).

    I got you. It is just my opinion, that regardless of politics, LJ will absolutely not stay at PSU...potentially beyond this season. He's had other major offers in the past, and I believe of all the coaches on the current staff, he bangs heads with Joe the most. He's had battles with Joe over recruiting, discipline issues, personnel, and gameplans. I do believe we will see Joe back next year, and unless he has been promised something behind closed doors (which I doubt would happen while Joe is still in the picture), I can't see LJ staying for another year of this. I'm still shocked he didn't take the Illinois job, but he would be easily the most in demand assistant on our staff if he went on the open market. If this season goes downhill in a hurry and our recruiting class fizzles at LOI Day, I wouldn't be shocked at all if LJ goes elsewhere.

    signature image signature image signature image

    tdiddy

  • psubills62 said...

    I'm surprised so many people would be sold on Chris Petersen as coach. He wasn't handed a middling Boise State team - Dan Hawkins led that team to a 53-11 record over 5 years (8-4, 12-1, 13-1, 11-1, 9-4). Now Hawkins is 19-34 with Colorado. I like what Petersen has done at Boise State, but I certainly wouldn't assume that his success will translate that easily.

    For out of house candidates, I have to think that Ferentz, Fitzgerald, and Harbaugh are three of the top choices for a lot of people. Not sure about Mike Stoops, don't really know enough about him, though Arizona has done decently the last couple of years.

    I'm sure sneakypete will get on my case, but I'm not sure Bradley would be that horrible of an option. I know our defense has had its problems, but most of the time our offense is the real issue. The only time I can remember our offense not being the main problem is possibly against USC - but even then a few turnovers were very costly.

    From what Sean has said about the coaches clashing in-house, I'd like to imagine that Bradley might clean house for the offense, somewhat. Get rid of the guys who aren't pulling their weight and bring in some others. Bradley may keep the status quo, but I don't know if that's a guarantee.

    Petersen has been there long enough to turn over the entire roster since Hawkins left. He's also performed very well in big games against superior teams. His roster this season is 100% his recruits...and they're pretty dang good.

    Again, I don't think he'd come to PSU, but there is no denying that he's probably one of the top 10-15 coaches in the country right now.

    signature image signature image signature image

    tdiddy

  • I live in Tucson and I have to say the jury is still out on Mike Stoops. His job was on the line until he won the Holiday Bowl two seasons ago, his first winning season in 5 years on the job. Clearly, some of the credit to his success the last two years has been due to the hire of Sonny Dykes, (former O.C. from Texas Tech) who left this past off-season. But, according to a friend of mine who played for him for one year, Stoops is a very knowledgeable X's and O's guy-at least on the defensive side of the ball. He also was smart enough to relinquish control of the offense.

    He knew enough that a pro-style offense with the talent he was bringing into Tucson wouldn't be successful, so he went to the spread. He recruits hard with mixed results-from a recruiting site standpoint- but is able to find some less-recruited players that can make a difference. The best player on the offense is a former 2-star recruit, who is now considered a top-10 WR. His defenses are generally good and he seems to develop DB's particularly well.

    The biggest concerns are his fiery nature (his sideline tantrums used to be considered an embarrassment until he started winning) and his ability to get consistent effort out of his players. Every year, his teams play up to the level of good teams and pull off upsets yet lose to "inferior teams". The Iowa game is a perfect example of playing up to the competition. He followed it up with a stinker against Cal, but unlike the last few years, Arizona found a way to win this time.

    With regards to academics, he inherited a trainwreck from Mackovich. Arizona had an abysmal graduation rate. I'm not sure if it's getting better but it really can't be getting any worse. All in all, he'd be an interesting choice if bigger names don't work out. I suspect with better talent and resources, he could be an excellent coach. I would say that most people here think this job is just a stepping stone to a bigger program.

    signature image

    “We need to keep this (expletive) together,” Mauti and Zordich to Hill

    psujmc1992

  • tdiddy said...

    Petersen has been there long enough to turn over the entire roster since Hawkins left. He's also performed very well in big games against superior teams. His roster this season is 100% his recruits...and they're pretty dang good.

    Again, I don't think he'd come to PSU, but there is no denying that he's probably one of the top 10-15 coaches in the country right now.

    I understand that, and I think they're very good too. I'm just saying that considering how Hawkins has done at a BCS conference school after having very good success at Boise State, I wouldn't guarantee that Petersen will have success at PSU similar to what he's done with Boise State. He might, he might not. I just think there's reason to be cautious.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • tdiddy said...

    I got you. It is just my opinion, that regardless of politics, LJ will absolutely not stay at PSU...potentially beyond this season. He's had other major offers in the past, and I believe of all the coaches on the current staff, he bangs heads with Joe the most. He's had battles with Joe over recruiting, discipline issues, personnel, and gameplans. I do believe we will see Joe back next year, and unless he has been promised something behind closed doors (which I doubt would happen while Joe is still in the picture), I can't see LJ staying for another year of this. I'm still shocked he didn't take the Illinois job, but he would be easily the most in demand assistant on our staff if he went on the open market. If this season goes downhill in a hurry and our recruiting class fizzles at LOI Day, I wouldn't be shocked at all if LJ goes elsewhere.

    That is really depressing to hear, since he's pretty much the only guy keeping our recruiting afloat. If LJ does leave, what do you see happening with recruiting and who do you believe would become the DL coach? Also, where do you think LJ would go? I'm trying to think of worst-case scenario, and OSU immediately came to mind. Can't imagine LJ's skills and recruiting prowess in our prime areas being put to use at that school.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • I would be intrigued by Mack Brown, but no chance in hell he ever leaves texas on his own accord.

    Ferentz
    Golden
    Schiano

    Itzsessil

  • Mack Brown is set to retire within a few years time.

    The longer Joe sticks around, and the more I dwell on it, the more likely I think it is that we go outside the program to hire.

    Imo, Spanier understands the importance of a successful football program to Penn State University. When the team is winning, and winning big, applications to the University increase. A bigger pool of applicants typically means, academically, a stronger freshmen class. I'd, also, suspect that giving to the University is loosely correlated to how well the football program is doing. Graham catches a lot of flack from a lot of folks, but he is no idiot sitting in Old Main.

    Also, imo, Spanier desires to lessen the "pull" of the head football coach and the football staff. That necessitates a clean break from Paterno and his current staff.

    Now, I also think that Spanier fully realizes that he'll have to pay fair market value for a head coach who will bring everything that Penn State desires - success on the field, success off of the field, and long term commitment to the University and football program. Don't let past comments about not wanting to pay much fool you. He won't get into a bidding war for the Meyers and Sabans of the world, who will simply bolt when a better offer comes their way. However, he won't handicap himself by not paying fair market value for a coach, because he realizes just how important that job is to the University.

    .............................................

    As for the next head coach....

    I'll begin with the criteria that truly matters - player development, game planning, and in game adjustments. There is a very limited list of coaches who truly excel in these areas. There are, also, a lot off coaches who are just "ok." The elite Xs and Os coaches, imo, are:

    Jim Tressel
    Urban Meyer
    Nick Saban (imo, the best pure football coach in America)
    Chris Peterson
    Jim Harbaugh
    and I might throw in Mack Brown
    and Bo Pelini might already be there, although I haven't seen enough of Nebraska

    If the goal is to be THE elite football program in America, then the hire must come from the above group. Imo, the only two viable options, from either viewpoint, are Harbaugh and Peterson.

    After that initial group, there is a list of 2nd-tier candidates that is longer and more likely. Those names include:

    Tom Bradley (The only in-house guy who would be offered the job)
    Kirk Ferentz (although 1) I doubt PSU would pay him what he makes now and 2) I doubt he'd actually leave Iowa. He's got mega job security out there.)
    Al Golden (He's got the off-field stuff down pat. His Xs and Os remain a question mark)
    Pat Fitzgerald (He does things the right way, and gets a lot out of his players. Will he ever be an elite Xs and Os coach?)

    Names mentioned that I'd pass on:

    Schiano (Flavor of the Week in 2006. Beneficiary of the 85 scholarship limit, but has since proven that he's a pretty poor Xs and Os coach)
    Mike Stoops (2010's Flavor of the Week. If Arizona hadn't beaten Iowa, would his name even be mentioned in this thread?)
    Randy Edsell (He did nice things at UConn, but is he really worthy of a big-time job? I've yet to see any evidence that he is a really good football coach)

    psufan32

  • Itzsessil said...

    I would be intrigued by Mack Brown, but no chance in hell he ever leaves texas on his own accord.

    Ferentz Golden Schiano

    Mack Brown is going to retire. Not to mention, he handles very little of the actual football work within the program. His coordinators develop the entire gameplans...he loosely oversees. He keeps his eye on the big things...recruiting, fundraising, logistics, etc. ESPN had a great 7-part feature on Mack Brown a few weeks ago...very enlightening about the Texas program.

    signature image signature image signature image

    tdiddy

  • psubills62 said...

    That is really depressing to hear, since he's pretty much the only guy keeping our recruiting afloat. If LJ does leave, what do you see happening with recruiting and who do you believe would become the DL coach? Also, where do you think LJ would go? I'm trying to think of worst-case scenario, and OSU immediately came to mind. Can't imagine LJ's skills and recruiting prowess in our prime areas being put to use at that school.

    I have no idea where he would go, but he would have a lot of offers. I heavily doubt OSU would be where he would end up, but you never know for sure. Recruiting is already in the toilet, and LJ has had his hands tied ever since the multiple disappointments from the 2006 class. Joe didn't take kindly to some of the kids LJ convinced him to allow on campus. He still wins a few battles (Oakman this year), but for the most part, Joe vetoes a lot of the kids he would normally pursue. Really, I think the "powers that be" are focusing their energies on preserving and covering for Joe rather than building the future of the entirety of the program. We've become very shortsighted, and it's causing major frustration with a lot of people...internally and externally. The longer this is allowed to go on, the worse the situation will be when change inevitably happens.

    signature image signature image signature image

    tdiddy

  • tdiddy said...

    I have no idea where he would go, but he would have a lot of offers. I heavily doubt OSU would be where he would end up, but you never know for sure. Recruiting is already in the toilet, and LJ has had his hands tied ever since the multiple disappointments from the 2006 class. Joe didn't take kindly to some of the kids LJ convinced him to allow on campus. He still wins a few battles (Oakman this year), but for the most part, Joe vetoes a lot of the kids he would normally pursue. Really, I think the "powers that be" are focusing their energies on preserving and covering for Joe rather than building the future of the entirety of the program. We've become very shortsighted, and it's causing major frustration with a lot of people...internally and externally. The longer this is allowed to go on, the worse the situation will be when change inevitably happens.

    Thanks for the insight, I didn't realize things were that bad.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • Bunker mentality either in practice or subconsciously. Doesn't have to be that way but it is hard when you know the head man's days are numbered, people are jockeying for position & power while the head man continues to protect himself by necessity through blind loyalty.

    There are so many names that could be the new HC it is amazing. It either will be a very difficult decision or very easy meaning Bradley gets the default short term position to maintain the Paterno money donation machine continues to run while Joe has influence. After that it will really be up in the air as to what happens. I could see, in a Bradley HC decision, a second HC coming is within five years as they use Bradley to transition the program and fund raising into the direction they really want to go for the long term.

    FG Dreadnought

  • FG Dreadnought said...

    Bunker mentality either in practice or subconsciously. Doesn't have to be that way but it is hard when you know the head man's days are numbered, people are jockeying for position & power while the head man continues to protect himself by necessity through blind loyalty.

    There are so many names that could be the new HC it is amazing. It either will be a very difficult decision or very easy meaning Bradley gets the default short term position to maintain the Paterno money donation machine continues to run while Joe has influence. After that it will really be up in the air as to what happens. I could see, in a Bradley HC decision, a second HC coming is within five years as they use Bradley to transition the program and fund raising into the direction they really want to go for the long term.

    I can tell you, with insight from a very knowledgable person, that Bradley is not wild about that idea. He would rather receive the gig on his own merit or leave the program. He does not want to be a temporary scapegoat, and he's also not wild about the idea of having Paterno look over his shoulder. Take it with its proper grain of salt...I know I do. I used to think Bradley was a "shoo-in" but the more I hear, the less I believe we end up with an internal person.

    signature image signature image signature image

    tdiddy

  • If Joe Pa is living, and I think their is a very good chance we stay in house with Bradley. If he isn't...the chance we go outside goes up significantly.

    If Joe Pa is living, and we go outside, it is going to be someone who he knows and likes. So a John Harbaugh or Chris Peterson or Mike Stoops is unlikely. Meanwhile, Fitzgerald, Ferentz, and Golden would all set themselves up perfectly.

    signature image signature image signature image

    We Are...Penn State!

    PK5

  • PK5 said...

    If Joe Pa is living, and I think their is a very good chance we stay in house with Bradley. If he isn't...the chance we go outside goes up significantly.

    If Joe Pa is living, and we go outside, it is going to be someone who he knows and likes. So a John Harbaugh or Chris Peterson or Mike Stoops is unlikely. Meanwhile, Fitzgerald, Ferentz, and Golden would all set themselves up perfectly.

    PK, I think you'd be surprised at the level of internal disdain that the Admin and boosters have toward Joe. We all know that the main reason Joe is still around is monetary. However, let's just say that some serious money is going to start drying up very quickly if change does not occur. It's already starting, but what I've been told is that there will be strong action taken when the major boosters' send their annual letters to Spanier following the season. Also, the boosters who I've spoken with strongly believe that Spanier's preference is to go outside the program and create as much distance from Joe as possible.

    Again, take it FWIW...it's a small sample of the whole pot, but they seem pretty convinced that this is the majority belief of those who contribute the most money and the Admin.

    signature image signature image signature image

    tdiddy

  • tdiddy said...

    PK, I think you'd be surprised at the level of internal disdain that the Admin and boosters have toward Joe. We all know that the main reason Joe is still around is monetary. However, let's just say that some serious money is going to start drying up very quickly if change does not occur. It's already starting, but what I've been told is that there will be strong action taken when the major boosters' send their annual letters to Spanier following the season. Also, the boosters who I've spoken with strongly believe that Spanier's preference is to go outside the program and create as much distance from Joe as possible.

    Again, take it FWIW...it's a small sample of the whole pot, but they seem pretty convinced that this is the majority belief of those who contribute the most money and the Admin.

    I hope you are right. IMO, I think going outside the program is the best option for this program for the reason you stated, to esecape from Joe and everything he has done. You don't want to hire a coach from within and continue to have things done the same way. I can just from hearing people talk that there are many that are upset about how Joe is running the team, or lack there of, and they aren't going to be renewing their season tickets in 2011 due to the same lack-luster performance this football team plays in every big game. It's time for a change and somebody has to stand up to Joe and or Spanier and state their case as to why a change is needed ASAP in order to end this before Joe runs the program he built into the ground.

    signature image

    PSUjosh11

  • Whoever it is, I just hope the tradition does not change. Joe himself is tradition.
    It's one thing that sets PSU apart from any other football program.

    I've thought about it alot. Can PSU keep the tradition without joe around? I'm not old enough to have seen what was before joe, so he's all i know. While I firmly believe he should think about his retirement, let's face it, it's going to be a tough transition for everyone, to include just fans like us.

    I would have a stroke if a young coach comes in and puts names on the backs of the jerseys, or something crazy like that.

    signature image

    "People ask me why I stayed here so long, Look around, Look around, I stay here because I love you all" R.I.P. Joe - 12/21/1926-01/22/2012

    arch1102

  • arch1102 said...

    Whoever it is, I just hope the tradition does not change. Joe himself is tradition. It's one thing that sets PSU apart from any other football program.

    I've thought about it alot. Can PSU keep the tradition without joe around? I'm not old enough to have seen what was before joe, so he's all i know. While I firmly believe he should think about his retirement, let's face it, it's going to be a tough transition for everyone, to include just fans like us.

    I would have a stroke if a young coach comes in and puts names on the backs of the jerseys, or something crazy like that.

    I'm totally with you on maintaining the tradition. I have a hard time believing that our administration would hire someone like Rich Rodriguez or Lane Kiffin. Those are the guys who care less about tradition and only care about themselves. I think our athletic department and administration will hire the right person for the job. Someone who is young, has great character and excellent morals - all of which are important in coaching the Penn State football team and being part of the Penn State family.

    signature image

    PSUjosh11

  • tdiddy said...

    PK, I think you'd be surprised at the level of internal disdain that the Admin and boosters have toward Joe. We all know that the main reason Joe is still around is monetary. However, let's just say that some serious money is going to start drying up very quickly if change does not occur. It's already starting, but what I've been told is that there will be strong action taken when the major boosters' send their annual letters to Spanier following the season. Also, the boosters who I've spoken with strongly believe that Spanier's preference is to go outside the program and create as much distance from Joe as possible.

    Again, take it FWIW...it's a small sample of the whole pot, but they seem pretty convinced that this is the majority belief of those who contribute the most money and the Admin.

    Again, thanks for the insight. That does seem a bit surprising. If the letters from the boosters are similar to what you indicate, how likely is it that Joe might end up being forced out after this season? Will Spanier really put pressure on Joe to retire?

    I also agree with Josh and arch regarding the tradition. It seems obvious that going to Kiffin/Rodriguez extremes could alienate a lot of fans of PSU. Getting someone who understands and respects Penn State tradition, and is willing to work within that framework is pretty important, to me at least.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • psubills62 said...

    Again, thanks for the insight. That does seem a bit surprising. If the letters from the boosters are similar to what you indicate, how likely is it that Joe might end up being forced out after this season? Will Spanier really put pressure on Joe to retire?

    I also agree with Josh and arch regarding the tradition. It seems obvious that going to Kiffin/Rodriguez extremes could alienate a lot of fans of PSU. Getting someone who understands and respects Penn State tradition, and is willing to work within that framework is pretty important, to me at least.

    The disgruntlement from the big dollar donors is no different that it is from the fans who were "STEPPED ON". Everyone wants to be successful.

    Spanier won't push Joe out after this season when Joe only has one year left on his contract, too much controversy and he knows Joe will go kicking and screaming if he tries to push, been there and done that before.

    tdiddy brings up some good points and apparently has some good connections. The thought that Bradley was the shoe in is diminishing daily. Bradley portends more of the same old thing to most fans/boosters. That is not fair to Bradley but it is the pervasive opinion. I think Bradley should have a shot and let him take his position with the committee who interviews. If Bradley wants a clean break, give him a shot. If he wants to keep too much, sorry, we'll find a spot for you to retire in the AD or somewhere like we do everyone else.

    I guess the major issue is whether Joe can weather the current season if things continue to go down hill. I hope they don't for all of our sakes, fans, players, coaches, etc. Still, how could a University President give a nearly 85 year old man a new contract extension next summer or at the end of the contract? It is not reasonable or prudent given the current situation with new rumors and facts coming out weekly about dissension while the team looks confused and recruiting is not going well.

    FG Dreadnought

  • FG Dreadnought said...

    The disgruntlement from the big dollar donors is no different that it is from the fans who were "STEPPED ON". Everyone wants to be successful.

    Spanier won't push Joe out after this season when Joe only has one year left on his contract, too much controversy and he knows Joe will go kicking and screaming if he tries to push, been there and done that before.

    tdiddy brings up some good points and apparently has some good connections. The thought that Bradley was the shoe in is diminishing daily. Bradley portends more of the same old thing to most fans/boosters. That is not fair to Bradley but it is the pervasive opinion. I think Bradley should have a shot and let him take his position with the committee who interviews. If Bradley wants a clean break, give him a shot. If he wants to keep too much, sorry, we'll find a spot for you to retire in the AD or somewhere like we do everyone else.

    I guess the major issue is whether Joe can weather the current season if things continue to go down hill. I hope they don't for all of our sakes, fans, players, coaches, etc. Still, how could a University President give a nearly 85 year old man a new contract extension next summer or at the end of the contract? It is not reasonable or prudent given the current situation with new rumors and facts coming out weekly about dissension while the team looks confused and recruiting is not going well.

    All great points. From the little I hear, the Eddie Robinson record is of utmost importance to the Paterno family, and they know he only needs next year to get there. They absolutely will not allow him to be forced out with one year remaining on his contract and one year short of the record...it WILL NOT HAPPEN. The magic number is 12. Unfortunately, as I stated before, I think the program has become very shortsighted. Right now, it's all about preserving Joe and a sustainable level of competitiveness long enough to make it to that point. The future is a major concern, but the real issue won't explode until next year. With one year left on his deal, the publicity that a run toward the record would make, a team returning a ton of juniors and experienced underclassmen, a more favorable schedule...I see Joe being a small issue this year. The Admin will call people's bluffs...they won't cancel season tix with Bama, Iowa, and a possible record breaking game on the schedule next year. I think the writing is very clearly on the wall that next year would be the year to make the shift...and even then, it might not. But I am 100% confident that Joe will be back next year...regardless of how bad his health might be...and there will be little discussion otherwise during the offseason.

    signature image signature image signature image

    tdiddy

  • tdiddy said...

    All great points. From the little I hear, the Eddie Robinson record is of utmost importance to the Paterno family, and they know he only needs next year to get there. They absolutely will not allow him to be forced out with one year remaining on his contract and one year short of the record...it WILL NOT HAPPEN. The magic number is 12. Unfortunately, as I stated before, I think the program has become very shortsighted. Right now, it's all about preserving Joe and a sustainable level of competitiveness long enough to make it to that point. The future is a major concern, but the real issue won't explode until next year. With one year left on his deal, the publicity that a run toward the record would make, a team returning a ton of juniors and experienced underclassmen, a more favorable schedule...I see Joe being a small issue this year. The Admin will call people's bluffs...they won't cancel season tix with Bama, Iowa, and a possible record breaking game on the schedule next year. I think the writing is very clearly on the wall that next year would be the year to make the shift...and even then, it might not. But I am 100% confident that Joe will be back next year...regardless of how bad his health might be...and there will be little discussion otherwise during the offseason.

    I get what you're saying, but he's run out of time. He's lost the BOT.

    CAJones10

  • All i know is that i want to see Mike Munchak coaching the offensive line.

    signature image

    I'm in BSD's head

    SCTowny