-
SCTowny said...
yes it would be interesting, because penn state never takes players who had to take the ACT 7 times to qualify.
but in case you were wondering about some of penn state's recruits....
Williams carries a 2.8 GPA and 810 SAT. http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=963487
Hayes reports a 2.8 GPA and a 840 SAT. http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1200843
1150 SAT http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1721749
3.1/1190 SAT http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1150446
2.8 GPA. http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1184276
Not available. http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1633566
3.2/March 27 SAT http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1190826
3.5/970 SAT http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1167365
3.1/May SAT http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1201157
3.5/1100 SAT http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1290905
King carries a 2.8 GPA and has a 900 SAT. http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1132386
4.2 GPA, 1,250 SAT http://pennstate.scout.com/a.z?s=157&p=8&c=1&nid=1200121
-
mad4psu said...
Bottom line is that your premise, while interesting, doesn't necessarily translate into a meaningful discussion.
Top three is arbitrary, first of all. Recruiting is done for need, not for style points. So, if the best prospect (skills, grades, character, etc) is number four, is that REALLY a failure?
Too much emphasis on rankings and not nearly enough on "fit". Would you really be happy if we were, by some weird quirk, to get a class of ALL five star kids whose egos wouldn't allow them to actually put the team ahead of their own agenda?
While I'm not happy with the apparent disarray in our recruiting efforts, rating stars (or state rankings) do not guarantee success. So, inferring that PSU is a failure because they haven't recruited enough Top Three PA athletes is, IMHO, is flawed.

Update: Rushel Shell has a top six