-
fortheglory94 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1464 votes total - (1118)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Lions247 only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial
-
JettaPSU2001
- 5 stars Rating: 96
2340 votes total - (2313)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Gunslinger317
- 5 stars Rating: 95
198 votes total - (321)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Lions247 only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial
ejb5212
- 5 stars Rating: 87
4442 votes total - Eddy J-B
- (6335)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Gunslinger317 said...
Which is exactly why he wasn't "fired" in 04. I don't understand this argument about him being fired in 04 as proving he was the most powerful man on campus. He was the most powerful person when it came to football and his job security it doesn't mean he could tell Curley or Spanier what to do in other areas of the campus.
If Joe was an advertising salesman and his bosses came to him and said I think it's time you turn over your accounts to someone else. Joe says I don't think so. His bosses know full well they don't have support to get rid of Joe from their board and know he will take some major accounts with him. The bosses come to the conclusion it's not worth the potential problems to get rid of him. So Joe has put himself in a position that makes near impossible to show him the door. Doesn't mean he runs the entire company.
That's one example we could also talk about teachers or high school coaches who's fate is also contigent on board votes not an AD, principal or super intendent.
I'm sure Curley and Spanier discussed 04 with the Bot. Enough people said talk to him and see what he says. They got their answer and decided it wasn't worth the headaches to force him out.
This post was edited by psujmc1992 on 11/21/2011 at 11:07 PM
psujmc1992 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2922 votes total - (5146)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psujmc1992 said...
So, do you agree he was the most powerful person related to football and/or athletic department issues? That is all that is relevant regarding the scandal. If he was, would Sandusky have been fired or forced to retire without Joe not having an inkling as to why? Hasn't it been widely reported that Joe, himself, told Sandusky that he would never be the head coach? Is there any way he hadn't heard rumors when people in the community and throughout college football had heard them (at least according to several recent articles). No-one cares if Joe could hire or fire a biology teacher. They want to know how he didn't know very important details about someone who worked directly underneath him and who unexpectedly "retired" at the peak of his career but decided to stick around.
-
pennstatel0 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 89
501 votes total - (476)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psujmc1992 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2922 votes total - (5146)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psujmc1992 said...
So, do you agree he was the most powerful person related to football and/or athletic department issues? That is all that is relevant regarding the scandal. If he was, would Sandusky have been fired or forced to retire without Joe not having an inkling as to why? Hasn't it been widely reported that Joe, himself, told Sandusky that he would never be the head coach? Is there any way he hadn't heard rumors when people in the community and throughout college football had heard them (at least according to several recent articles). No-one cares if Joe could hire or fire a biology teacher. They want to know how he didn't know very important details about someone who worked directly underneath him and who unexpectedly "retired" at the peak of his career but decided to stick around.
This post was edited by Gunslinger317 on 11/21/2011 at 11:48 PM
Gunslinger317
- 5 stars Rating: 95
198 votes total - (321)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
JC from LP said...
"No idea"... absolutely not
Proof that he could use to help aid the investigation and further the ability to take legal action = no. Pretty sure he didn't take a rape kid from the shower scene..... unless I missed this somewhere in the grand jury report.
Seriously.... know your role... pretty sure Paterno did.
I know people who beat their wives.... doesn't mean she'll testify
I know people who deal drugs..... doesn't mean I know when they have them on them
I know people who ______________
I know people who ______________
I know lots of shady ass people.... (nature of the job)....I'm willing to bet that 90% of the people who ask the same question have positions in life that are greatly sheltered from this type of exposure to these types of people....
I've worked in juvenile sex offender residential units.... this black and white "why didn't Joe do something?" crap has got to go. Wear the shoes and see what its like to tangibly deal with that real problem on a daily basis.... you don't just say... hmmmmmm I think this guy does things that hurt people.... I'm gonna string him up by the balls and ruin him.
Use your head.
psujmc1992 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2922 votes total - (5146)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars








Tom Corbett exposed in Newsweek