-
rmj147 said...
? I am black and think BOB is one of the top college coaches in the game. I also think Tomlin is a great coach. One is white, one is black... However, when you examine the number of coaches in higher positions (HC, DC, OC) in college and the NFL, the numbers indicate that there are far fewer coaches in those positions, period. Then you look at the coaches with good reputations and records and how they are treated... there appears to be a difference. You can ignore it if you want, but Herm Edwards never got another coaching job, yet was praised by HS coaches... Just an example, but there are others. Charlie Strong is doing a hell of a job at Louisville... Was he even nominated for any of the COY awards? Again, this isn't 1968. But we still have to look at the numbers and facts. A long way to go, especially in a sport where so many position coaches are black... I am really not understanding what you are saying. Have you brought any hard facts to this argument? Any real examples? Or are you just continually saying "stop crying" and "there is no problem" without bringing anything else to the table?
-
philafan said...
But the exact same thing can be said for the actual players... More players are black that is a fact. So how does that not apply??
I think anyone with a clue knows they play the best players in the NFL.
Why would they not select the best coaches? Sometimes the simplest answer is the correct answer.
Strong was a top choice of Tennessee he said no. Edwards was awful and fired twice.
-
rmj147 said...
I didn't say about Strong not having a job. He is the man in KY. I asked if he was nominated for any COY awards after the job he did (serious Q, I dont know... But if not, that's telling).
Again, I agree with Nit. Players and coaches are diff animals. It's easy to see what a player can do on film, but measuring how much a coach has to do with wins/losses, team morale, effort, etc. is tougher to measure. But there are coaches of color with great resumes, great credentials, great reputations that have yet to get HC gigs- black and white. The opportunities are few to begin with. But, even afte that, the numbers don't lie when it comes to the numbers. Period. So now Im racist for suggesting that black coaches have had fewer opportunities? lol Wow.
-
psumichael said...
Some good discussion in this thread.
Unless you know the inner workings of the Lovie Smith situation though you have no idea if owners didn't hire him because they're racist. For all we know he could be arrogant or overly demanding in interviews. Or his agent could turn off owners before they even get to the point of talking seriously.
This post was edited by rmj147 on 1/19/2013 at 2:33 PM
-
rmj147 said...
Look. here is a decent article summarizing part of the problem. I don't agree with everything this guy says, just had to throw that out there... But I do agree with this:
"The real reason for the problem can be exemplified with the Arians hire. The real reason is coaches of color have still not broken into, in significant numbers, the NFL's old-boy network. They are, to many owners and others in the NFL, outsiders. Until that changes, the numbers will remain somewhat bleak.
This is what I mean. Arians was fired by the Pittsburgh Steelers -- some reports said Arians retired, others said his contract was not renewed. The truth is he was let go by the team.
After that, Chuck Pagano, coach of the Indianapolis Colts, hired Arians to be his offensive coordinator. Pagano and Arians are close friends.
When Pagano fell ill, Arians became the interim coach.
And that sequence, more than anything, illustrates the biggest reason for the problem. There are almost no black coaches who could get fired from a nice position (or retire or not have his contract renewed) and then have a close enough friend as a head coach who could immediately give him the same nice position.
Most black assistants don't have those types of connections. They are not part of that network. They also don't quickly get that same type of chance.
This is not the case all the time. There are exceptions, but in many instances this is what happens."
The network of minority coaches just isn't as big... Attached below are sheer numbers from the NCAA... And keep in mind, college is even worse- even more of a "good ol boys" network. Which makes the job Sumlin is doing in the SEC even more incredible.
-
MtNittMoonshine
- 5 stars Rating: 90
545 votes total - (264)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MtNittMoonshine said...
I think if a white owner wants to hire a less qualified white coach over a more qualified black coach, by all means, let him do it. It's his money to waste. If you want to win, hire the best people possible no matter what color they are. It's ridiculous to try to give people a job or interview based on nothing more than the color of their skin anyway.
-
MtNittMoonshine said...
I think if a white owner wants to hire a less qualified white coach over a more qualified black coach, by all means, let him do it. It's his money to waste. If you want to win, hire the best people possible no matter what color they are. It's ridiculous to try to give people a job or interview based on nothing more than the color of their skin anyway.
-
rmj147 said...
Look. here is a decent article summarizing part of the problem. I don't agree with everything this guy says, just had to throw that out there... But I do agree with this:
"The real reason for the problem can be exemplified with the Arians hire. The real reason is coaches of color have still not broken into, in significant numbers, the NFL's old-boy network. They are, to many owners and others in the NFL, outsiders. Until that changes, the numbers will remain somewhat bleak.
This is what I mean. Arians was fired by the Pittsburgh Steelers -- some reports said Arians retired, others said his contract was not renewed. The truth is he was let go by the team.
After that, Chuck Pagano, coach of the Indianapolis Colts, hired Arians to be his offensive coordinator. Pagano and Arians are close friends.
When Pagano fell ill, Arians became the interim coach.
And that sequence, more than anything, illustrates the biggest reason for the problem. There are almost no black coaches who could get fired from a nice position (or retire or not have his contract renewed) and then have a close enough friend as a head coach who could immediately give him the same nice position.
Most black assistants don't have those types of connections. They are not part of that network. They also don't quickly get that same type of chance.
This is not the case all the time. There are exceptions, but in many instances this is what happens."
The network of minority coaches just isn't as big... Attached below are sheer numbers from the NCAA... And keep in mind, college is even worse- even more of a "good ol boys" network. Which makes the job Sumlin is doing in the SEC even more incredible.
Edit: And to somewhat answer your question, there aren't many assistants... Which is part of the problem and illustrates the problem detailed above in this post.
-
waylander said...
So how do you break the cycle then?
And numbers can and do lie. I could reverse your argument to NBA players and say they are discriminatory toward whites. Because numbers don't lie right? NBA was 78% African American in 2011. Clearly something is amiss.... Just as I can make the same argument that the NHL is discriminatory against minorities - if I just used the numbers.
-
rmj147 said...
What I am saying is that there are factors of why there are less minority coaches to get shots in the first place. I am not saying that owners are racist or are turning away coaches for the color of their skin... Again, had to make that clear, because everyone seems to think thats what Im saying.
MtNittMoonshine
- 5 stars Rating: 90
545 votes total - (264)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
rmj147 said...
? Players are based on physical talent, easily identifiable on film... Totally different process and smaller numbers for coaches. Not to mention that it takes time to build a resume and prove yourself as a coach. The opportunity is the most important thing. So yes, numbers for players in the league are irrelevant when discussing coaching vacancies. Totally irrelevant. Give coaching numbers and it would be relevant. But no, those numbers have nothing to do with coaching opportunities. Got it?
-
rmj147 said...
? Players are based on physical talent, easily identifiable on film... Totally different process and smaller numbers for coaches. Not to mention that it takes time to build a resume and prove yourself as a coach. The opportunity is the most important thing. So yes, numbers for players in the league are irrelevant when discussing coaching vacancies. Totally irrelevant. Give coaching numbers and it would be relevant. But no, those numbers have nothing to do with coaching opportunities. Got it?
-
PureRockFury ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
2681 votes total - (2950)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bluey said...
This isn't meant to start any heated debates about race, but I just wanted to see others opinions.
Is anyone else really bothered with people complaining that no black head coaches were hired in the NFL? What has our world come to? I mean if the best candidate is white, black, yellow or anything in between that is who I am hiring. I understand that a lot of NFL owners are older and may have some racial issues, but whatever. The majority of owners simply want to win and just want who they think can coach the best. It almost seems that the NFL wants to force owners to hire black head coaches, and that is simply ridiculous.
Why are there a lot more black players in the NFL than white? Why aren't there more black people playing in the NHL? When will there be anything done about race in regards to players? If we are to ignore coaching ability should we ignore player talent as well?
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6






The Rooney Rule