-
strez said...
Danny O'Brien recently announced his intent to transfer from the Terps. Supposedly, Edsall gave him a list of schools he cannot transfer to, including Vandy and other ACC schools. My question: the fact that your prior school can control who you can transfer to seems reasonable in the context of an undergrad leaving the program to play for another school. But in this case, O'Brien will be a graduate. Can a school still control your destiny in a transfer once you have graduated from that school? If so, under what authority? This seems counterintuitive to me. I wonder if it is legally defensible.
-
Hamilton Lion
- 4 stars Rating: 76
4474 votes total - (8124)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
getmyjive11
- 5 stars Rating: 81
7283 votes total - (10303)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MTayl72 said...
Yeah, that's always been an interesting bit that I have wondered about. But it seems the LOI befomes binding when you enroll in that school and begin classes. Since he has he is still bound to attend that school until they release him
This post was edited by UncleLar on 2/16/2012 at 3:16 PM
-
MTayl72 said...
Yes I know that the NCAA rule governs transfers. Sorry, I'll clarify more. It was poorly written as I was walking to a lunch meeting, my mistake. And yes I know whether or not you signed a LOI the NCAA looks at transfers, I have helped athletes with that in the past.
LOI thing is weird. As we were talking about it last week. Once a player signs it they are committed to that school. to go somewhere else you must be released from it. However, if you sign a LOI and have not enrolled there is no transfer penalty
-
UncleLar said...
" if you sign a LOI and have not enrolled there is no transfer penalty"
That's only true if you get released from your LOI. If you don't get released, there's a really big penalty in that you not only have to sit out a year but you also lose a year of eligibility. That's even worse than transferring because transfers can at least use a redshirt year to sit out.
ejb5212
- 5 stars Rating: 87
4445 votes total - Eddy J-B
- (6341)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ejb5212 said...
I'm pretty sure that's what happened when lane kiffin went to USC, and there was nothing that tenn could do because they hadn't attended classes yet
This post was edited by Texas Lion on 2/18/2012 at 4:47 PM
Texas Lion ●
- 4 stars Rating: 77
3364 votes total - (8499)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
UncleLar said...
I'm not clear what you are referring to by "that" in "that's what happened when".
It sounds like you are saying that Tennessee had kids who signed a LOI but went somewhere else even though they had signed an LOI.
I can assure you that if that happened and the kids played without sitting out a year, then Tennessee released the kids from their LOI. If you can name some kids, I'd be glad to look them up and prove it to you.
EDIT: Here. I'll prove it without any names. Lane Kiffin took the job with USC on January 13th. National Letter of Intent signing day is in February so Tennessee couldn't have had ANY kids who had signed LOIs before he left.
Hamilton Lion
- 4 stars Rating: 76
4474 votes total - (8124)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
ejb5212
- 5 stars Rating: 87
4445 votes total - Eddy J-B
- (6341)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
UncleLar said...
Thanks for that info. Early enrollees don't sign LOIs so they obviously aren't bound by them. Without an LOI, Willis would have been locked into Tennessee once he had attended a class. I suspect that classes hadn't started yet so he was thus free to go to North Carolina without the transfer rules coming into play..
Hamilton Lion
- 4 stars Rating: 76
4474 votes total - (8124)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
UncleLar said...
You mixing up a couple of things.
One, the LOI becomes binding when you sign it, not when you enroll.
Two, the NCAA rules regarding transfers are applicable whether you have signed an LOI or not.
Three, O'Brien's transfer is governed by NCAA rule, not the LOI agreement.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Buckeye Warrior on 2/19/2012 at 1:47 AM
Buckeye Warrior
- 4 stars Rating: 78
15024 votes total - (14234)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Texas Lion ●
- 4 stars Rating: 77
3364 votes total - (8499)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Buckeye Warrior said...
I think you might be wrong. The LOI becomes binding when the player enrolls, not when he signs it. Ejuan Price SIGNED his LOI to play for Ohio State in Febuary of last year, but got released and played for Pitt this past year. He didn't have to sit out a year like a transfer normally has to because he never enrolled at Ohio State. Maybe the NCAA changed the rules from last year, but Price transferred without sitting a year and had no hardship waiver (like a lot of transfers do when they get to play right away).
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=3&sqi=2&ved=0CDAQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.sites.post-gazette.com%2Findex.php%2Fsports%2Fvarsity-blog%2F28012-woodland-hills-lb-ejuan-price-will-attend-pitt-stepoli-no-longer-at-monessen&ei=-aZAT4noOquw0QHr4bi4Bw&usg=AFQjCNF1oA-J0X9gGwdqjovveNwBTG7MJQ
-
Buckeye Warrior said...
I think you might be wrong. The LOI becomes binding when the player enrolls, not when he signs it. Ejuan Price SIGNED his LOI to play for Ohio State in Febuary of last year, but got released and played for Pitt this past year. He didn't have to sit out a year like a transfer normally has to because he never enrolled at Ohio State. Maybe the NCAA changed the rules from last year, but Price transferred without sitting a year and had no hardship waiver (like a lot of transfers do when they get to play right away).
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=3&sqi=2&ved=0CDAQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.sites.post-gazette.com%2Findex.php%2Fsports%2Fvarsity-blog%2F28012-woodland-hills-lb-ejuan-price-will-attend-pitt-stepoli-no-longer-at-monessen&ei=-aZAT4noOquw0QHr4bi4Bw&usg=AFQjCNF1oA-J0X9gGwdqjovveNwBTG7MJQ
-
UncleLar said...
I assure you that I'm not wrong.
You are confusing two things.
1. The LOI is binding when you sign it. 2. The NCAA transfer rules become applicable when you enroll in school and attend your first class.
Those are two different animals.
Price was able to play for Pitt because Ohio State gave him a release from his LOI. Had he not gotten a release, then not only would he have had to sit out a year but he also would have lost an entire year of eligibility. The NCAA transfer rules never applied to Price because he didn't take any classes at Ohio State.
Buckeye Warrior
- 4 stars Rating: 78
15024 votes total - (14234)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars









Question about the Danny O'Brien transfer