-
TallahasseeLion
- 5 stars Rating: 93
219 votes total - (410)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7976 votes total - (14812)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PSUJT$ said...
As much as I'd like to play FSU, PSU might be better served playing teams like USF for the next couple of years. Get into states like Florida but not have to play the powerhouses. JMO but a couple more wins every year is better than getting creamed by FSU. It will help keep PSU relevant and BOB won't have to deal with horrible records in recruiting. Curley might have done PSU a favor by scheduling some crappy teams over the next few years.
P.S. I'm always in favor of scheduling PItt more!
-
psubills62
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7976 votes total - (14812)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
JoePaturfshoes ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
107 votes total - (108)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TallahasseeLion
- 5 stars Rating: 93
219 votes total - (410)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PSUJT$ said...
As much as I'd like to play FSU, PSU might be better served playing teams like USF for the next couple of years. Get into states like Florida but not have to play the powerhouses. JMO but a couple more wins every year is better than getting creamed by FSU. It will help keep PSU relevant and BOB won't have to deal with horrible records in recruiting. Curley might have done PSU a favor by scheduling some crappy teams over the next few years.
P.S. I'm always in favor of scheduling PItt more!
-
psubills62 said...
In terms of scheduling, here's what I'd like to see in general each year:
1 big-name team (FSU, Alabama, etc.)
1 team that has a decent name, but not as good (e.g. USF this year, maybe Rutgers)
1 team that is OK, and not a big name (SDSU, e.g.)
1 bad team.That's ideally. I'd have no problem with 2-3 cupcakes and one decent team if we're struggling a lot for wins over the next couple of years.
-
psubills62 said...
In terms of scheduling, here's what I'd like to see in general each year:
1 big-name team (FSU, Alabama, etc.) 1 team that has a decent name, but not as good (e.g. USF this year, maybe Rutgers) 1 team that is OK, and not a big name (SDSU, e.g.) 1 bad team.
That's ideally. I'd have no problem with 2-3 cupcakes and one decent team if we're struggling a lot for wins over the next couple of years.
-
Blissios said...
1. We need big time matchups to put butts in seats. 2. Goal will be competing for a division championship. Coaches may feel that playing real OOC foes helps with that. 3. Recruiting. Even if kids can't play in championship games they will want to feel as though they are playing games that could/will decide who plays for the championship.
Have to think that we might be able to get a game with Oregon considering BOB and Kelley are friends and the Phil Knight connection.
psubills62
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7976 votes total - (14812)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PSUGeddy said...
Mine would be similar: 1 powerhouse team at an NFL stadium like the days when we played USC at the Meadowlands 1 game every year with one of our former regional rivals, Pitt, Cuse, Terps, WVU, Rutgers 1 SEC game every year to help recruiting in the region 1 Cupcake
This schedule seems risky but it all works out in the end with recruiting. We get the national exposure playing the powerhouse, we get the southern exposure playing the SEC team and we get the regional exposure playing one of our natural rivals.
Texas Lion ●
- 4 stars Rating: 77
3256 votes total - (8151)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars





Potential Home & Home with FSU