Online Now 697

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 437
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 710
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell and swap tickets

Reply

Paterno on the decline in attendance

  • jonpsu said...

    so they had over 100% capacity vs. FSU and were at 92% capacity and during the UNC game at 94% of their avg attendance from last year...

    I'm not seeing the point here. They didn't sell out vs. UNC and on average they wouldn't in any recent years. If you're argument is that they are doing so well that they should and they aren't bc of the economy... ok... solid argument.

    I still don't think the economy is the main factor for PSU - I do think it's A factor.

    Yeah my point was the second part and I agree with you that PSU is more than the economy. There's just a staleness in the program right now.

    PSUfan28

  • This post is for members of Lions247 only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial

    nttnylyon

  • This post is for members of Lions247 only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial
    signature image

    PSUjosh11

  • You live in a fantasy land if you don't think the economy is factoring into people deciding whether or not to attend games. You live in a fantasy land if you don't think the on-field product isn't affecting people deciding whether to attend games or not. If the economy improves and the product improves I don't think the conversation takes place in the future. If neither improve there will continue to be empty seats. If the product improves but the economy doesn't there will be fewer empty seats in my opinion. The converse may not be true. People want to feel good about spending their money.

    vflion

  • vflion said...

    You live in a fantasy land if you don't think the economy is factoring into people deciding whether or not to attend games. You live in a fantasy land if you don't think the on-field product isn't affecting people deciding whether to attend games or not. If the economy improves and the product improves I don't think the conversation takes place in the future. If neither improve there will continue to be empty seats. If the product improves but the economy doesn't there will be fewer empty seats in my opinion. The converse may not be true. People want to feel good about spending their money.

    I'd be willing to bet that the economy is only about 25-35% of the issue here. The rest of it is people just being tired of the same old, same old.

    signature image

    PSUjosh11

  • For me it's not the economics of it. It never has been and never will be.

    This is the first time in a long time that I just didn't feel like going to some of the games and chose to do other things with my Saturday. Sure I went to Alabama and I went to the Iowa game and I'll go to this one and Nebraska but I just hate driving 3+ hours to watch a stale program.

    But I'll keep renewing my seats hoping against hope that one day this program turns the corner and returns to it's glory days.

    FireJayPa

  • seriously? we had something like 105K for iowa, and 100k for Purdue and on TV the place looked packed. I' m guessing for Nebraska we'll get close to 110.

    We're hardly struggling here. Almost all of the unsold seats are in the middle od the field, where Penn State jacked up the prices. There was a MAD rush to get end zone seats by people who got affected by STEP. Those seats sold out almost as soon as soon as they were available.

    Follow the metadata. This has almost NOTHING to do with a protest against the greatest coach in college football history, and everything to do with the AD office and the Big 10 being greedy scum bags.

    As much as people wish otherwise, the paying PSU fanbase isnt as upset with Joe as people here think. Possibly Jay because of the QB shenanigans, but Joe? We still love him, we realize this team is underachieving, but also realize that the PSU experience is still a fantastic one.

    Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

    appoo

  • appoo said...

    seriously? we had something like 105K for iowa, and 100k for Purdue and on TV the place looked packed. I' m guessing for Nebraska we'll get close to 110.

    We're hardly struggling here. Almost all of the unsold seats are in the middle od the field, where Penn State jacked up the prices. There was a MAD rush to get end zone seats by people who got affected by STEP. Those seats sold out almost as soon as soon as they were available.

    Follow the metadata. This has almost NOTHING to do with a protest against the greatest coach in college football history, and everything to do with the AD office and the Big 10 being greedy scum bags.

    As much as people wish otherwise, the paying PSU fanbase isnt as upset with Joe as people here think. Possibly Jay because of the QB shenanigans, but Joe? We still love him, we realize this team is underachieving, but also realize that the PSU experience is still a fantastic one.

    Speak for yourself, the experience isn't that great except for one or two (maybe three) games a year.

    Queue the piped in AAA baseball music instead of the Blue Band. Do some self promoting of the "Greatest Show In College Football". Bring out the "microphone guy" and ask if everyone is ready to ROCK AND ROLL. First quarter - more piped in music - *LIONS ROAR!!!*

    Second quarter - show the dance squad (which is awesome by the way! +1 to them)

    Queue the old guy on the jumbo-tron as they play some Sweet Caroline.

    Queue the stupid half time show where everyone goes to the bathroom or to get food. Students sit down, old people stretch.

    Queue more AAA baseball music - time for everyone over the age of 55 to sit down and be quiet because they are trying to watch the game. Yell at younger alumni that are standing on 3rd and short trying to be loud and support the defense. Let's throw in the wave (slow motion and reverse)

    Scores from around the league and inflated attendance

    Ring the Victory Bell.

    FireJayPa

  • FireJayPa said...

    For me it's not the economics of it. It never has been and never will be.

    This is the first time in a long time that I just didn't feel like going to some of the games and chose to do other things with my Saturday. Sure I went to Alabama and I went to the Iowa game and I'll go to this one and Nebraska but I just hate driving 3+ hours to watch a stale program.

    But I'll keep renewing my seats hoping against hope that one day this program turns the corner and returns to it's glory days.

    FireJayPa...you are just plain wrong!

    http://nittanyextra.com/?tag=beaver-stadium

    "Attendance at Beaver Stadium has dipped this season, even though Penn State is 7-1 and ranked. Attendance for two games (Indiana State and Eastern Michigan) has been below 100,000, the first time that has happened since Beaver Stadium was expanded for the 2001 season."

    Even during the Dark Years we were seating more fans than after STEP. " It's the ECONOMY stupid." And its the STEP increase in ticket prices that accerbates the poor economy leaving more fannies on the sofa and less in the bleachers of Beaver Stadium.

    "product" has nothing to do with it. We're 7-1 thru the first 8 games and ranked in the top 20.

    Cheers!

    Kirk

    This post was edited by psufankc63 on 10/26/2011 at 6:04 PM

    signature image

    Fantastik! Is really formula 409! WE ARE....

    psufankc63

  • Anyone who says that either economics or the product on the field has nothing to do with the decline in attendance either has a very large supply of statue polish or has so much animosity toward Joe that they can't see straight. The reality is it's both. How many people have to come on here and say for them that its the economy/STEP, while others say its the state of the program. And don't give me the 7-1 nonsense and ranked in the top 20, thats a product of our schedule. This team could EASILY finish 7-5, which I don't think they will. But please, take it easy on our record and ranking, lets see where this team finishes.

    This post was edited by We Are27731 on 10/27/2011 at 7:43 AM

    We Are27731

  • PSUjosh11 said...

    No, Joe, look in the mirror, the reason why the seats are empty is because of your less then enticing and fun product you put on the field. If we had any type of offense at all (coupled with this D) the stadium would be packed every home game regardless of the opponent.

    I will be anxious to see what the stadium is like this Saturday vs. Illinois and especially vs. Nebraska on Nov. 12.

    But our team has always been built around playing good, tough defense. Why isn't that fun football? Other than 1982, 1994, 2005, and a few other years here and there, we've rarely had a high-powered offense. Yet people still came to the games. I think there is legitimate frustration with the program right now, but to say the product is boring or stale is simply an easy excuse that overlooks other more difficult issues.

    I think JoePa is right here. The economy and STEP are big reasons why we are seeing empty seats. It is simply asking people too much to pay $55-70 per ticket, plus donate hundreds or thousands of dollars for the privilege of buying tickets, and to then drive several hours each way to get to the game and to then pay for parking/food/hotel seven times a year, when you could watch most games in high-def in the comfort of your home and make 1-3 trips to Beaver Stadium for select games.

    That is the same reason that Michigan -- despite having the most exciting player in college football in Denard Robinson and an energetic new head coach in Brady Hoke -- is also seeing plenty of empty seats at the Big House.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Cambria Nittany on 10/27/2011 at 9:47 AM

    Cambria Nittany

  • psufankc63 said...

    FireJayPa...you are just plain wrong!

    http://nittanyextra.com/?tag=beaver-stadium

    "Attendance at Beaver Stadium has dipped this season, even though Penn State is 7-1 and ranked. Attendance for two games (Indiana State and Eastern Michigan) has been below 100,000, the first time that has happened since Beaver Stadium was expanded for the 2001 season."

    Even during the Dark Years we were seating more fans than after STEP. " It's the ECONOMY stupid." And its the STEP increase in ticket prices that accerbates the poor economy leaving more fannies on the sofa and less in the bleachers of Beaver Stadium.

    "product" has nothing to do with it. We're 7-1 thru the first 8 games and ranked in the top 20.

    Cheers!

    Kirk

    I'm not wrong - I'm saying FOR ME. Not for everyone else. FOR ME.

    I know some people aren't going because of the economy, I get that. I'm saying , in my case , it's everything that I mentioned. So re-read what I said before going all (Whatever that Raging Cajuns name was that said "IT's the Economy Stupid")

    Also it's a very stale 7-1. Sure we are ranked in the top 25 and are 7-1. But the atmosphere for big games compared to other games is night and day.

    This post was edited by FireJayPa on 10/27/2011 at 9:59 AM

    FireJayPa

  • The decline in attendance is the combined result of several factors.

    STEP not only increased the cost of season tickets for many seats within Beaver Stadium, the re-seating/seat license program did not bother to factor in loyalty and past donations.

    The economy has taken its toll on many in this country, and college football fans have not been excluded. The overall cost of attending a Penn State game has gone up significantly since 2007, yet, for most, real wages have stagnated or declined.

    The product on the field is and has been predictable. Some label it as stale. Penn State has had two nice runs since 1999, and the stadium has filled during those years with an excited fanbase. During the 'Dark Years', the stadium filled, even though the waiting list evaporated after the 2001 expansion. Perhaps the fans filed in because of the hope that the team would quickly return to the elite level of play that had long been the norm in Happy Valley. Today's 30 and under crowd has never known a Penn State team to sit atop the polls.

    The 'product' today is a different one than ten or twenty years ago. The experience today is largely about the crowd and pop music piped in through the speakers. Attend an NFL, NBA or NHL game and the experience is very similar. The University has driven and embraced the changes and sold the endless string of cliches to the fanbase, largely tossing aside the intricacies and uniqueness that long defined the Penn State football experience.

    Many different factors, applicable on different levels to different alumni and fans,

    This post was edited by psufan32 on 10/27/2011 at 10:39 AM

    psufan32

  • This whole argument is ridiculous. Both factors are equally important. When money is tight, people have to decide where to spend discretionary/entertainment dollars. Is the product on the field good enough that people are willing to spend MORE money than they were accustomed to? For some, the answer is no.

    The university took a gamble just like the Yankees did with the new Yankee Stadium. Only time will tell if it was the right move. But to increase ticket sales, they have to improve the "value", either by convincing people it's worth the money (improving the product) or decreasing the cost.

    signature image

    “We need to keep this (expletive) together,” Mauti and Zordich to Hill

    psujmc1992