Online Now 769

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 423
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 635
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell and swap tickets

Reply

Patern Fmily Statement (7/10) - Long

  • I can see being disappointed that Joe did not do more, but to throw the blame on him and vilify him is ridiculous. He is human and screwed up, but from the beginning the BOT has done nothing but position Joe to take the fall. This Freeh report is all part and parcel in that. If this is such a professional report, why the leaks? Especially specific ones that make Joe look bad? Why was the report allowed to stray from investigating the Sandusky situation and into other aspects of PSU - including discipline of non-football students? (As reported in the news) This was totally unnessecary and actually quite stupid. What other school would allow investigators cart blanche to look for negative things to report. And make no mistake, thats what they were doing. The investigators should of been directed to keep their investigation to the facts of the JS case only. Someones agenda has been helped by this report.....As for Joe, I respect the man and always will, but I thought he coached 10 years too long and wished he would of done more when MM came to him, and just to make it clear I am not a Joe worshipper in any way shape or form. I am also convinced that this whole episode helped put him in his grave. We Are and always will be......!

    psupartyman

  • psupartyman said...

    I can see being disappointed that Joe did not do more, but to throw the blame on him and vilify him is ridiculous. He is human and screwed up, but from the beginning the BOT has done nothing but position Joe to take the fall. This Freeh report is all part and parcel in that. If this is such a professional report, why the leaks? Especially specific ones that make Joe look bad? Why was the report allowed to stray from investigating the Sandusky situation and into other aspects of PSU - including discipline of non-football students? (As reported in the news) This was totally unnessecary and actually quite stupid. What other school would allow investigators cart blanche to look for negative things to report. And make no mistake, thats what they were doing. The investigators should of been directed to keep their investigation to the facts of the JS case only. Someones agenda has been helped by this report.....As for Joe, I respect the man and always will, but I thought he coached 10 years too long and wished he would of done more when MM came to him, and just to make it clear I am not a Joe worshipper in any way shape or form. I am also convinced that this whole episode helped put him in his grave. We Are and always will be......!

    I know some of the leaks came from the BOT's special "task force" that is monitoring the investigation. His name is Ken Frazier. He went on record saying that the report will be very bad for JoePa, the football program, and the administration after a meeting with Freeh group to check on status of investigation

    TheBleedingLion

  • TheBleedingLion said...

    I know some of the leaks came from the BOT's special "task force" that is monitoring the investigation. His name is Ken Frazier. He went on record saying that the report will be very bad for JoePa, the football program, and the administration after a meeting with Freeh group to check on status of investigation

    This kind of makes you wonder now that you bring it up...

    PSUBrister

  • TheBleedingLion said...

    I know some of the leaks came from the BOT's special "task force" that is monitoring the investigation. His name is Ken Frazier. He went on record saying that the report will be very bad for JoePa, the football program, and the administration after a meeting with Freeh group to check on status of investigation

    Down goes Frazier...

    F the NCAA F the BOT F ESPN F Sandusky

    PSU42Fan

  • TheBleedingLion said...

    I know some of the leaks came from the BOT's special "task force" that is monitoring the investigation. His name is Ken Frazier. He went on record saying that the report will be very bad for JoePa, the football program, and the administration after a meeting with Freeh group to check on status of investigation

    This after the discussion the other night in the Freeh report thread about the BOT "task force'(i.e. deflection management and selective focus group maybe?) having a chance to view things before the public

    It does indeed make ya wonder.

    signature image signature image

    If you havent signed up for premium 247 yet..take my word for it...its worth it!

    Seltz

  • People need to stop reading history backwards. Amazing how people look at the actions of those involved at the time as though it is obvious that they knew at the time whatbwe know now. That Sandusky was a monster and not some creep.

    That Joe knew he was going to die within two months and had said all he could have said.

    Or that the investigation would focus on the issues with VT and that he would need to go in depth into individual player issues.

    Blissios

  • TheBleedingLion said...

    sneaky;

    i think one mistake people are making is the same mistake the media is making. I'm not a Joe apologist and welcome all facts. But lets take what we know for what it is and not ignore the "hindsight" portion of his statement:

    1. MM testified that he didnt tell Joe exactly what he saw, he also proved during cross examination that he wasn't even sure what he saw...which ultimately led to an acquittal on that incident. That alone speaks volumes, but lets keep going on it to address Joe's "moral obligations." So basically Joe knows Jerry was in the showers with a child, thats it, why would he assume that a man like Jerry was doing something so devious. He obviously thought that alone was wrong and reported it to Curley and Shultz for further investigating. So he wasn't ok with it like many say he was. He had no reason to believe child molestation was happening and doing so and publicly stating something so disturbing without actual facts can also be viewed as morally wrong, no? We all like to say we would have done this or done that, but thats easy to say now after seeing 10+ victims come forward. His statement that "with the benefit of hindsight I wish I had done more" shows that at 84 and battling lung cancer he still was more intelligent and centered than 90% of us who fly off the handle when difficult situations arise.

    2. I'm not sure how any of you can criticize the Paterno's handling of their public statements. The guy was fired in front of a national audience, gagged, and literally left to die without being able to address his response to what happened. The family can't defend themselves against what they dont know. Leftcoast is way off base with his position. This material hasn't been presented to them so they literally have no clue what Joe is being accused of, if anything, by the Freeh Report. Not sure what else you want them to say. But I applaud their stance that they are not afraid of what the report says and are ready to respond when its presented to them. They have complete confidence in Joe and I see no reason for them to apologize to people. Sure, he gave an interview before he died, but even then he still didn't know a lot of what was about to come out, so he couldn't address the investigation fully. To me, that is proof that he really didn't know what was about to come out. A guilty man is always easy to read in my opinion because they become defensive and forging, Joe did neither and is being criticized for it because people assume he knew more. Some people need to get over the perception that Joe Paterno ruled State College, Pa. Sure, he had some pull and his words were very influential, but lets not assume he used the power people gave him outside his realm of responsibility. Because there is not one fact out there that he EVER did this, just assumptions. Time and time again Joe asked people to not view him as larger than life, does that not tell you something about how he viewed himself?

    3. I'm not trying to defend Joe, I'm trying to defend the facts. I don't think there will be a happy ending for Joe regardless of what the report says because the damage is done and it really saddens me. You can't change public perception and the loudest voice tends to be the most ill-informed. We were very fortunate to have someone like Joe running our football program for so many years, and we took great pride in that. It made our fan base what it is and different from everyone else in my opinion. Like I said before, if it comes out that Joe did out step his boundaries and did turn a blind eye then shame on me and I can honestly say that it will really change my belief that there are truly good people out there. It will also be completely heart broken because I am a fan of Penn State Football because of the old cry "winning the right way." And that to me goes beyond the student athlete, its the culture, a culture Joe Paterno brought to Penn State that has withstood the test of time.

    Your wasting your breath on that one...you won't convince people that have made up their mind one way or another. I think it is sad that people are so quick to judge based on whatever "facts" (or lack there of) are out there. The reality is the media has skewed public perception in regards to this whole mess. Yes people certainly screwed up here but to what extent each person is guilty is not known and probably never will fully be known. But it is not just Joe Paterno or Penn State, there are MANY people included in this including the Second Mile, the former AG, the State College Police, Children and Youth Services, several high schools, the kids families (yes they get some guilt too), etc. The problem is Joe Paterno and Penn State are household names that draw viewership and readership on the interwebs so they take the most blame. If sneaky and anyone else that wants to believe that Joe could have told his story then fine let them. The fact is that the story even stated that Joe was not fully with it due to the fact that he was dieing of lung cancer during the interview. If people can't accept that reality than whatever...let him.

    PvillePA_Lion

  • PvillePA_Lion said...

    Your wasting your breath on that one...you won't convince people that have made up their mind one way or another. I think it is sad that people are so quick to judge based on whatever "facts" (or lack there of) are out there. The reality is the media has skewed public perception in regards to this whole mess. Yes people certainly screwed up here but to what extent each person is guilty is not known and probably never will fully be known. But it is not just Joe Paterno or Penn State, there are MANY people included in this including the Second Mile, the former AG, the State College Police, Children and Youth Services, several high schools, the kids families (yes they get some guilt too), etc. The problem is Joe Paterno and Penn State are household names that draw viewership and readership on the interwebs so they take the most blame. If sneaky and anyone else that wants to believe that Joe could have told his story then fine let them. The fact is that the story even stated that Joe was not fully with it due to the fact that he was dieing of lung cancer during the interview. If people can't accept that reality than whatever...let him.

    I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. It's funny though how when you present actual facts you become labeled a "Joe Pa apologist". I'm not apologizing for Joe, because I dont think there is anything to apologize for right now.

    When I was in high school (catholic school), our dean of students was a younger, engaging guy. Not a priest or member of the clergy. He was really cool, into sports and many students related to him because of that. Three or four years after i graduated, it came out that he was having sex with a female athlete who at the time was a junior. I was shocked and immediately started to think back to the times I saw him and the student together in the halls, his office, wherever. Once I knew what he had done, It certainly changed my opinion and i wasn't surprised. But back then I thought nothing of it because he was a very decorated educator who had nothing other than a positive influence on many students, myself included. Granted I never saw them in the shower and I'm certain if I saw he and the subject in the shower I would have done something. Point is, the guilt lies with Sandusky and until i see anything concrete to support intentional acts of negligence, I refuse to lay any blame with anyone else.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by TheBleedingLion on 7/11/2012 at 8:24 AM

    TheBleedingLion

  • Blissios said...

    People need to stop reading history backwards. Amazing how people look at the actions of those involved at the time as though it is obvious that they knew at the time whatbwe know now. That Sandusky was a monster and not some creep.

    That Joe knew he was going to die within two months and had said all he could have said.

    Or that the investigation would focus on the issues with VT and that he would need to go in depth into individual player issues.

    Your first paragraph is the driving force behind almost all of this. 95% (no exaggeration) of the people out there commenting on this case have (without consciously doing so in most cases) molded everything together and believe that the PSU decision makers in question in some way purposefully covered up for an established and well known serial child molester. So people are feeling overly righteous and bit vengeful. Never mind that it's not a remotely accurate summation of what actually happened.

    gemrich

  • PSU42Fan said...

    WTF?

    Did they not state their concern that the leaks indicate an anti-Joe agenda?

    How is this a "lack of response?"

    Agree.

    How do you defend something when you are not sure what is being stated either? It's not as if they have a copy of the report in their hand. They need to respond to leaks...oh they did that already. They should ask for everything to go public....they did that already too. It's odd how clueless some are as to what the family has done. They react to latest release and simply forget the other things stated.

    "One man didn't build this program and one man sure as hell cannot tear it down."

    LaJollaLion

  • gemrich said...

    Never mind that it's not a remotely accurate summation of what actually happened.

    And you know this how? We all know what happened (or didn't, in this case). None of us know exactly why, which is the crux of the problem.

    signature image

    “We need to keep this (expletive) together,” Mauti and Zordich to Hill

    psujmc1992

  • PSUJT$ said...

    How is the content and opinions expressed in this aricle relevant to the Penn State internal investigation? It's not. Everything Joe did or didn't do was done behind closed doors.

    Freeh got access to internal PSU memos which will once and for all soil Joe's reputation and as with most people, he did it to himself.

    PSUBlueBlood

  • PSUBlueBlood said...

    How is the content and opinions expressed in this aricle relevant to the Penn State internal investigation? It's not. Everything Joe did or didn't do was done behind closed doors.

    Freeh got access to internal PSU memos which will once and for all soil Joe's reputation and as with most people, he did it to himself.

    How do you know this? If they were internal and the report isn't out, aren't you just making a guess?

    "One man didn't build this program and one man sure as hell cannot tear it down."

    LaJollaLion

  • PSUBlueBlood

    Freeh got access to internal PSU memos which will once and for all soil Joe's reputation and as with most people, he did it to himself.

    SMH. One comment from another individual, interpreted incorrectly and out of context surely does not soil anything.

    Itzsessil

  • psujmc1992 said...

    And you know this how? We all know what happened (or didn't, in this case). None of us know exactly why, which is the crux of the problem.

    I'm not saying there wasn't a coverup, just that no one knew what kind of true nut job Sandusky was at the time. That's the main point. Most people are subconsciously joining the two and that makes them angry. I don't believe for one second that anyone had a clue what kind of person Sandusky actually was at the time those decisions were made.

    That doesn't excuse any potential mistakes they made, it just makes it (potentially) an issue with stupidity as opposed to something much more sinister.

    gemrich

  • gemrich said...

    I'm not saying there wasn't a coverup, just that no one knew what kind of true nut job Sandusky was at the time. That's the main point. Most people are subconsciously joining the two and that makes them angry. I don't believe for one second that anyone had a clue what kind of person Sandusky actually was at the time those decisions were made.

    That doesn't excuse any potential mistakes they made, it just makes it (potentially) an issue with stupidity as opposed to something much more sinister.

    Got it. Thanks for clarifying. I still think Spanier should have known and done more given his background and area of expertise.

    signature image

    “We need to keep this (expletive) together,” Mauti and Zordich to Hill

    psujmc1992

  • Some things will never change. For PSU fans it is the relentless defense of all things Paterno. I did nothing other than express frustration with the Paterno family's continued failure to tell Joe's side of the story, and got bombed by nearly 60 down votes.

    new-era said... Psu doesnt have enough to beat the conferences better teams and wiscy is one of them.

    leftcoastlion

  • leftcoastlion said...

    Some things will never change. For PSU fans it is the relentless defense of all things Paterno. I did nothing other than express frustration with the Paterno family's continued failure to tell Joe's side of the story, and got bombed by nearly 60 down votes.

    Yes, you're a victim.

    Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

    appoo

  • Paterno family. Please go away. Thanks.

    perfect

  • leftcoastlion said...

    Some things will never change. For PSU fans it is the relentless defense of all things Paterno. I did nothing other than express frustration with the Paterno family's continued failure to tell Joe's side of the story, and got bombed by nearly 60 down votes.

    Your frustration may be a bit misplaced. They have a legal team talking for them. We have no idea if they are also talking to any other parties lawyers in this instance. They also can't speak to a report which they have yet to see. They've been pretty damn patient while Joe gets dragged through the mud. How can people defend all things Paterno...or is it they don't bash all things Paterno as it goes both ways. I didn't downvote you and I get the frustration, but people both sides seem to be making some assumptions without all of the cards. I'm not sold the FreeH report tells anything other than how PSU handled it's administrative matters. The trials for TC, GS, and Spanier may be where the real details come out as to who knew what and when. We still aren't even clear as to what MM said to Joe or what as said beyond that. Now you have Spanier saying he never heard any of it.

    Patience is a virtue and the Paterno's seem to be fairly patient IMO after all the crap that has been stated about their father and husband. If it comes out Joe spearheaded something, we can crucify them all I guess. We really do not have all of the info, nor do they in terms of what the school is thinking. I'm pretty sure they have some bloody tounges in that house right now.

    "One man didn't build this program and one man sure as hell cannot tear it down."

    LaJollaLion

  • perfect said...

    Paterno family. Please go away. Thanks.

    A family that has done more for this University than any other family in the history of the University....and apparently have no right to defend themselves. If it was me, I'd sue to stop the release of the report until I got the chance to review it. I would guess there's more than a few judges that would agree with them.

    This post was edited by appoo on 7/11/2012 at 10:34 AM

    Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

    appoo

  • leftcoastlion said...

    Some things will never change. For PSU fans it is the relentless defense of all things Paterno. I did nothing other than express frustration with the Paterno family's continued failure to tell Joe's side of the story, and got bombed by nearly 60 down votes.

    i think the whole voting thing is ridiculous, i did not down vote you. Thats your opinion and your entitled to it regardless if i think your wrong or right.

    TheBleedingLion

  • psujmc1992 said...

    Got it. Thanks for clarifying. I still think Spanier should have known and done more given his background and area of expertise.

    I would tend to agree with you, but I just want to get all the facts (or as many as we can know) first.

    gemrich

  • appoo said...

    A family that has done more for this University than any other family in the history of the University....

    This type of hyperbole kills me. Joe and Sue (I guess) did a lot that benefited the University. What other Paterno did anything FOR Penn State? With regards to Joe, he won a lot of football games that increased the visibility of Penn State and was instrumental in increasing donations. But I don't buy he made "Penn State what it is today", like some claim. Brilliant faculty and students did.

    This post was edited by psujmc1992 on 7/11/2012 at 10:55 AM

    signature image

    “We need to keep this (expletive) together,” Mauti and Zordich to Hill

    psujmc1992

  • Just want to say that I find any moral convictions based on the idea that Paterno "should have done more" to be intellectually stupid at best.

    This post was edited by psubills62 on 7/11/2012 at 10:56 AM

    signature image

    psubills62