-
tmaluchnik ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1958 votes total - is a "Fighter"
- (2852)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Itzsessil ●
- 5 stars Rating: 86
2845 votes total - (3298)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psumichael said...
I just got a chance to watch this and came to post just about the same exact comment. It's been clear to me for a while that Peetz is an arrogant jerk who thinks she is smarter than everyone who ever asks her a question. I just had my mind blown though watching those clips of Ken Frazier. He might be more of a condescending ass than Peetz. It pains me to watch these arrogant fools, that played such a major role in the tragedy, representing our university.
As escape wrote....Wow....just wow.
I would highly recommend everyone view this video, regardless of your thoughts on the situation.
-
psufankc63 said...
I concur.
Peetz is a word that sounds like Bunt and Punt but starts with a capital 'C'. And Frazier is her enabler.
Both these tools bloviate as if they have something to hide. Merck Chemcial for Peetz, U.S. Steel for Surma and Frazier is some other big exec. Let's force them all to resign for the better of our Alma Mater!
Just disgusting.
-
edtee said...
I appreciate what you are trying to do, just wondering how effective it is. You may or may not care what I think, but my suggestion to you would be to first understand what goal you are trying to accomplish. Is it to bring this piece of the story to national limelight? Spout off to a small faction of loyal followers who are already all on board?
That will determine how you deliver your message. I went to see Michael Moore's 9/11 movie with an open mind, but in my opinion he's an idiot who twists facts to support his extreme point of view, and he spent much of the movie whining rather than presenting facts in an objective manner. A small portion of America who already had similar views cheered the movie as truth, most of America however saw it as some verying level of manufactured drama, and thus his credibility is cemented as a completely biased.
When I read your post, first of all,the general layout and presentation of who you are doesn't come across as your intent is to present a credible, unbiased view (and granted, all media are biased, but there is still a more 'objective' way to present it), more an angry rant appealing to a small, already convinced, but also biased faction of the public.
Maybe that's all you can do with no national credibility, but if there are facts that need to get out there, it's going to take a different vehicle to have the broad public hear it.
Good luck to you.
-
timoty said...
If you are trying get certain BOT 's to resign their positions (which is what we agree needs to happen), I don't believe this approach is going to work. You have to affect the targeted BOT's. Publish their respective full-time jobs and let us decide if we want to support their full time jobs by purchasing their products or services. If these companies start to see this affecting the bottom line, the BOT will have to make a decision of whether or not remain a board member or keep their full-time job. They will not resign on there own. This is my 2 cents on the matter!
-
MtNittMoonshine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
545 votes total - (263)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars





PSU BoT in their Own Words