-
Andrew Dzurita
- 5 stars Rating: 97
2839 votes total - Andrew Dzurita
- (4442)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6768 votes total - (12523)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MZizzle2
- 5 stars Rating: 86
2100 votes total - A Founding Father of the New Breed
- (12822)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lang06
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2068 votes total - Joe Langione
- (3761)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PSUfan28
- 5 stars Rating: 92
1885 votes total - Founding Fighter
- (6202)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6768 votes total - (12523)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lang06
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2068 votes total - Joe Langione
- (3761)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lang06
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2068 votes total - Joe Langione
- (3761)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Andrew Dzurita
- 5 stars Rating: 97
2839 votes total - Andrew Dzurita
- (4442)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Andrew Dzurita said...
Pretty sure the sample was deemed tainted because of the way it was handled, but you're right it was more of a technicality. Kind of dumb but that's on the MLB or whoever handled the test. How are you not 100% when you bring up the case against him? Just stupid on their part.
If winning was easy even losers would do it.
Lang06
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2068 votes total - Joe Langione
- (3761)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lang06 said...
Yea, we will probably never know for sure.
People testified that the sample was not tampered with and that normal action was taken when the test are given over the weekend.
A friend at work told me that Braun challenge that it wasn't his urine and offered a DNA test ... the MLB declined to do that.
Try to fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured .but not prove they're a citizen
-
sneakypete said...
Braun, did NOT challenge that it was tampered with and he did NOT challenge the science. He challenged protocol. Which is BS. The seal was still in tact and the person followed proper protocol as this situation has happened before and the same procedure was followed. I don't understand how this was overturned.The guy failed a test with 3-1 levels, doesn't challenge tampering or the science and wins. Huh??
Braun didn't argue evidence of tampering and didn't dispute the science, but argued protocol had not been followed. Multiple sources confirmed to ESPN investigative reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and T.J. Quinn that Braun questioned the chain of custody and collection procedure.
If winning was easy even losers would do it.
Lang06
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2068 votes total - Joe Langione
- (3761)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sneakypete said...
Braun, did NOT challenge that it was tampered with and he did NOT challenge the science. He challenged protocol. Which is BS. The seal was still in tact and the person followed proper protocol as this situation has happened before and the same procedure was followed. I don't understand how this was overturned.The guy failed a test with 3-1 levels, doesn't challenge tampering or the science and wins. Huh??
Braun didn't argue evidence of tampering and didn't dispute the science, but argued protocol had not been followed. Multiple sources confirmed to ESPN investigative reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and T.J. Quinn that Braun questioned the chain of custody and collection procedure.
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6768 votes total - (12523)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6768 votes total - (12523)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lang06
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2068 votes total - Joe Langione
- (3761)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6768 votes total - (12523)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
8484 votes total - (15307)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6768 votes total - (12523)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
8484 votes total - (15307)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 said...
That's always been one of the most frustrating parts of the judicial system. I know that procedure is pretty much necessary for consistency, but too often they seem to ignore the spirit of the laws to obey the letter.
Texas Lion ●
- 4 stars Rating: 77
3364 votes total - (8487)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
shavisimo2
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6768 votes total - (12523)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shavisimo2 said...
That's an unfortunate problem too. Good lawyers will put you straight into debt. Granted, it's not an issue for Braun or the MLB, but in general, most people must choose the best bargain lawyer.
Texas Lion ●
- 4 stars Rating: 77
3364 votes total - (8487)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
psubills62 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
8484 votes total - (15307)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
8484 votes total - (15307)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | ... | 163








Off Topic Board