-
getmyjive11 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 81
7273 votes total - (10277)
- 34 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
tdiddy said...
Nowicki is a guard. I think Shrive will move back to RT.
Next yr, I see the DC as...
RT:
1. Farrell
2. Shrive
LT:
1a. Smith
1b. GressI also wouldn't be surprised to see Kolb end up at RT and Cadogen at LT on the 3rd team. As far as the incoming recruits, both Johnson and Pollard could eventually be OT's, as well as James with the improved S&C program.
-
tdiddy said...
Nowicki is a guard. I think Shrive will move back to RT.
Next yr, I see the DC as... RT: 1. Farrell 2. Shrive LT: 1a. Smith 1b. Gress
I also wouldn't be surprised to see Kolb end up at RT and Cadogen at LT on the 3rd team. As far as the incoming recruits, both Johnson and Pollard could eventually be OT's, as well as James with the improved S&C program.
-
tdiddy said...
What makes you think he has the muscle to play internally?
Nowicki is a tremendous puller, and is best suited for inside. I do agree that it's too early to fix him into a definite spot though. Most of these guys are going to get mixed up a lot in the spring. Our current opinions of them really don't matter much...all about to change. We'll know more after the spring.
-
VinegarBased636
- 5 stars Rating: 92
418 votes total - (412)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
8484 votes total - (15307)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 said...
Honestly, I tend to have no problem using a mauling OG at OT. As long as he's decent in pass protection, I'm fine with it - he doesn't have to be stellar. Not saying I approve of guys like Barham (seriously, they have to be at least a decent OG to move them to OT at the LEAST), but with the RT position I don't think you always need the prototypical size and athleticism.
-
psubills62 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
8484 votes total - (15307)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars




OT's