-
Nittanynole said...
We're missing the point here - are we going to place metal detectors in malls, movie theaters, libraries, restaurants? Metal detectors aren't the answer, we need "crazy/evil/sick ^$%$&" detectors. We need to a) better understand the signs that are indicative of someone doing this, b) implement technologies and programs that help detect likely candidates, and c) pour resources into communities to fight this.
This post was edited by spud358 on 12/14/2012 at 7:23 PM
-
spud358 said...
point taken, but I maintain that security at schools is something we can control. like I said, the school I send my son to has fingerprint recognition to get through the door and plenty of urban schools have metal detectors and police stationed in the school. I appreciate your point, we can't be safe all the time and we can only do so much. However, there are technologies and preventative measures that can and do help prevent this kind of thing.
As for technology to identify candidates.... your are entering into the "Minority Report" issue. I'm a psychology grad student and even if we had the ability to predict that type of risk at a very reliable rate, what can we do about it? lock people up because we think, with a 95% confidence, that someone is at risk to go on a rampage? do we somehow force them into counseling is they have not broken any laws? It's just feasible and not something we will ever see. That's not to say that we can't do better. The case of the VT shooting is a good example. They had concerns and a chance to expand the services for him. although, he could have refused them though and unless he was making direct threats, no one could force him into treatment.
lastly, unfortunately, research budgets are getting slashed and there is no money to pour.
-
Nittanynole said...
No, you can't force someone into counseling, and you can't arrest them for what they might do, but you can certainly alert friends, family, etc, so that they can monitor the person's actions and remove easily accessible firearms, as in this case; you can place their names on firearms registries so they can't purchase weapons legally; you can forcibly commit them if they seem to be a threat to harm themselves or others; you can alert local authorities; and you can intervene other ways which might not reach every single person, but could make a significant impact. And yes, at some point, we may be forced to have a hard discussion in this country about forcible medication - injectable, time-release drugs to help those with mental issues remain stable. The resources exist - that was the point of my original post in this thread; we simply have to start thinking about this situation as defense of our population from domestic terrorism, not just "mental health treatment"
-
spud358 said...
that's not completely accurate. Unless someone willingly signs a release, we can not even tell family and close friends unless there is clear threat of danger. Maybe a discussion about changes to the confidentiality laws is a good place to start. What you suggest is already happening, or at least should be happening based on best practices. The issue is that much of the time there is no clear threat of danger to self or others presented. It would be much easier if every person that did something like this was in treatment and telling their treatment providers that they think about shooting people, but that's simply not the case.
-
Black Lion157723
- 5 stars Rating: 96
184 votes total - (77)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
newera142052
- 2 stars Rating: 25
4229 votes total - (1549)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
new-era said...
It is alarming because the rate at which these incidents are occuring is increasing. There is something wrong with a culture when things like this happen more frequently.
This school appeared to have an excellent security system but if it was the teachers son they probably buzzed him in. I think its sad but i think its to the point not only should people be buzzed in they should be searched. That goes for parents relatives anyone.
-
Texas Lion ●
- 4 stars Rating: 77
3256 votes total - (8152)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CKpsu5220
- 5 stars Rating: 91
539 votes total - Chris Kelly
- (732)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CKpsu5220 said...
The guy wasn't schizophrenic or anything imo. He was probably just a sociopath. No emotion whatsoever, so he killed. The worst thing is that the media just covers this non stop. Its a disservice to the people who died. Move on with coverage. This guy wins by getting covered on the news. He was a shut in sociopath outcast who now is famous. He wins. The fact is that the news loves covering the bad stuff.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7












OT: Horrible school shooting, 27 dead, 20 of them children.