Online Now 885

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 620
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 849
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell and swap tickets

Reply

Maryland and Rutgers to B1G..

  • BestoftheBig said...

    Well, like it or not, $ is the only thing that matters. Why would a school like Maryland, a charter member of the ACC, even consider jumping to the BIG? Or Nebraska from the Big12? It's all about the dollars.

    And like it or not, fair or not, when the Sugar Bowl wanted OSU and Delaney to negotiate a delayed suspension for those 5 players, that decision made the conference more money than if they would have not played and got blown out. A BIG team, defeating an SEC team is good for the conference, period.

    Well if it were all about $$, wouldn't it be in the best interest of the B1G to have PSU in Bowl Games?

    Obviously there is a balance between Risk and Reward and PR plays a major role in that.

    Delaney is a hypocrite. Yes he did the Risk Assessment when supporting OSU during their cheating. He also did a similar Risk Assessment during the 2nd Mile Sandusky Scandal and decided to side with the popular ESPN narrative instead of coming forward to support Penn State.

    What's good for the Conference should also translate to what's good for the individual conference members. Hence, my conclusion that Delaney and the B1G have two darlings and the rest are chaff. Which probably describes what the B1G loves the Huskers and has treated PSU with a cold shoulder ever since we joined.

    At least the addition of MD and RU should help to penetrate, or at least dilute the Midwest culture of solitude.

    signature image

    Fantastik! Is really formula 409! WE ARE....

    psufankc63

  • psufankc63 said...

    Well if it were all about $$, wouldn't it be in the best interest of the B1G to have PSU in Bowl Games?

    Obviously there is a balance between Risk and Reward and PR plays a major role in that.

    Delaney is a hypocrite. Yes he did the Risk Assessment when supporting OSU during their cheating. He also did a similar Risk Assessment during the 2nd Mile Sandusky Scandal and decided to side with the popular ESPN narrative instead of coming forward to support Penn State.

    What's good for the Conference should also translate to what's good for the individual conference members. Hence, my conclusion that Delaney and the B1G have two darlings and the rest are chaff. Which probably describes what the B1G loves the Huskers and has treated PSU with a cold shoulder ever since we joined.

    At least the addition of MD and RU should help to penetrate, or at least dilute the Midwest culture of solitude.

    That balance would only exist if the two situations were equal. They were far from it. Anything else is your obvious bias getting in the way. That happens. This was an NCAA decision that Delaney wisley let them handle. I have no issue with PSU not sharing in the bowl pot. They aren't eligible for bowls. Now OSU shouldn't either, and I've said that. But the OSU and PSU situations/events are lightyears different in a number of ways.

    MTayl72

  • psufankc63 said...

    Well if it were all about $$, wouldn't it be in the best interest of the B1G to have PSU in Bowl Games?

    Obviously there is a balance between Risk and Reward and PR plays a major role in that.

    Delaney is a hypocrite. Yes he did the Risk Assessment when supporting OSU during their cheating. He also did a similar Risk Assessment during the 2nd Mile Sandusky Scandal and decided to side with the popular ESPN narrative instead of coming forward to support Penn State.

    What's good for the Conference should also translate to what's good for the individual conference members. Hence, my conclusion that Delaney and the B1G have two darlings and the rest are chaff. Which probably describes what the B1G loves the Huskers and has treated PSU with a cold shoulder ever since we joined.

    At least the addition of MD and RU should help to penetrate, or at least dilute the Midwest culture of solitude.

    Of course it would be in BIG's best interest...I'm sure the BIG would LOVE for PSU and OSU to be in bowls this year, but there is nothing the BIG can do about it. The NCAA banned us, not the BIG.

    And Delaney did the same thing when he allowed OSU to play in the Sugar Bowl, he caved in to the "popular" choice. The Sugar and its sponsors were the requesting participants of all that. He did what he thought would benefit the BIG by keeping a good relationship with the Sugar (for future at large invites) and its sponsors. It wasn't the "right" thing to do, as I too think those players shouldn't have played in the Sugar Bowl. But in the end, it "probably" helped the conference.

    signature image

    BestoftheBig

  • MTayl72 said...

    That balance would only exist if the two situations were equal. They were far from it. Anything else is your obvious bias getting in the way. That happens. This was an NCAA decision that Delaney wisley let them handle. I have no issue with PSU not sharing in the bowl pot. They aren't eligible for bowls. Now OSU shouldn't either, and I've said that. But the OSU and PSU situations/events are lightyears different in a number of ways.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah...'nuff said. I'm not convincing you and you're not convincing me.

    You like to play Devil's advocate and I like to instigate. stir Or is it vice versa. shrug

    Anyway time to move on.

    Kirk

    cheers

    signature image

    Fantastik! Is really formula 409! WE ARE....

    psufankc63

  • psufankc63 said...

    Yeah, yeah, yeah...'nuff said. I'm not convincing you and you're not convincing me.

    You like to play Devil's advocate and I like to instigate. stir Or is it vice versa. shrug

    Anyway time to move on.

    Kirk

    cheers

    Deal bubble boy.

    MTayl72