Online Now 780

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 562
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 796
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell and swap tickets

Reply

Laschout Tweet...

  • Posas14 said...

    Keep looking - Find someone who stands for something more than the spread option. Find a leader.

    Why didn't the Gators offer him their job again? If he was the driver of their success?

    interesting. you are very anti-Mullen.

    This post was edited by bonovoxpsu on 11/28/2011 at 7:28 AM

    bonovoxpsu

  • white_out said...

    It's obvious PSU wants someone with no PSU ties. They want someone with HC experience.

    There are no sexy names out there, and those that are, won't touch Penn State with a 10' pole. Why didn't Florida hire him? I don't know, perhaps Florida viewed Muschamp as a bigger name, one that the fan base can get excited about. Maybe mack brown made a call on his behalf, I have no idea.

    I wouldn't mind James Franklin, but he just got locked up with a big buyout (rumored) and a big fat annual salary. So he's not an option.

    Al Golden? Nope Greg Schiano? Certainly not Jon Gruden? HC of the Eagles in 2012

    There's no one out there, and the hot assisants won't get looked at because PSU wants someone with HC experience.

    The 2 names that seem to be out there that everyone appears to like are Dan Mullen and Gary Patterson

    Ok what about Patterson? To your point.

    I need to study more about him, but I'm open to him. Winning the Rose Bowl at TCU, and producing Andy Dalton is pretty good.

    DM does not give me the impression that he's up to the job.

    Posas14

  • Posas14 said...

    Ok what about Patterson? To your point.

    I need to study more about him, but I'm open to him. Winning the Rose Bowl at TCU, and producing Andy Dalton is pretty good.

    DM does not give me the impression that he's up to the job.

    I would be fine with Gary Patterson. I haven't heard or seen his name much associated with this search.

    Having said that, Patterson would mean the end of Bradley, LJ, Vandy. Mullen maybe keeps 1 or 2 of them unless he brings Manny Diaz with him, which I would be absolutely fine with as well.

    signature image signature image signature image

    white_out

  • white_out said...

    I would be fine with Gary Patterson. I haven't heard or seen his name much associated with this search.

    Having said that, Patterson would mean the end of Bradley, LJ, Vandy. Mullen maybe keeps 1 or 2 of them unless he brings Manny Diaz with him, which I would be absolutely fine with as well.

    If we can hold on to our defensive staff - I feel a little better about Mullen. But not really -

    I have 2 other names, that are likely flawed in PSU people's eyes -

    Skip Holtz - (Holtz is a bad name, I agree), but is he up to the job?

    Paul Rhodes - Coached at Pitt in 2000 (fatal flaw), but seems like a good guy in post game comments after OSU win. Always tough against Iowa.

    Posas14

  • What has Skip Holtz and Paul Rhodes done that Mullen hasnt?

    signature image

    I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said.

    psu2013

  • Stronger leadership skills. More values than just football. Understand greater perspective of education, standing for something more than W/L - could be wrong. Just asking if they're worth looking at.

    Have a good day - at work.

    Posas14

  • Posas14 said...

    Stronger leadership skills. More values than just football. Understand greater perspective of education, standing for something more than W/L - could be wrong. Just asking if they're worth looking at.

    Have a good day - at work.

    Were not looking for Joe Pa v.2.

    As long as the next coach graduates his players and doesnt get us any NCAA sanctions then im ok with it.

    Hell, we might be getting sanctions because of Joe! What would everyone one say if thats the case.

    signature image

    I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said.

    psu2013

  • Posas14 said...

    Sounds like a bogus answer to me - notice that the "UF staffer" ignored the final question, of whether UF would have offered if DM were available....the silence meant "NO"

    Look, it's a hire. There is gray. I don't think he represents himself well.

    That's what I've got; he's a football mercenary. A very good OC, not a great HC, not a good face for the University, and not up to the full job. I'd hire him for OC; but HC is WAY WAY over his head due to gaps in leadership skills that are very apparent when you hear him speak.

    His defense does not tackle either.

    Or maybe the silence meant that he went to bed because it was late on a Sunday night. Or maybe he has real work to do on the UF site rather than take any more of his time voluntarily providing us with info. Very rarely do staff members from other sites comment on our threads. How long have u been around here again? And did you see us tackle the most athletic QB in our league at OSU last week? Or the best RB in our league 2 days ago? His D is responsible for tackling the best athletes in the country every week. I love Bradley, LJ and Vandy as defensive staffers, but I bet I wouldn't love them as much if our D had to tackle those kids every week. So he doesn't have the best DC and defensive staff in the biz. Doesn't mean he's bringing them to us. Doesn't mean they wouldn't be more successful in a league whose top teams (save Michigan) play a completely different style of offensive football.

    This post was edited by beck881psu on 11/28/2011 at 8:47 AM

    beck881psu

  • Posas14 said...

    Stronger leadership skills. More values than just football. Understand greater perspective of education, standing for something more than W/L - could be wrong. Just asking if they're worth looking at.

    Have a good day - at work.

    Rhoads needs at least another year at Iowa State before he has consideration for a job like this. I like Skip Holtz, but you want to talk about coming from a lineage of people who don't care about anything other than football...his pop had recruiting ciolations everywhere he went. I like Skip but he seems more like the Dan Mullen you describe than Dan Mullen does.

    Point is, you still are not putting together a cohesive argument against Mullen other than what you feel like from interviews. And wtf is a football mercenary? Someone who takes jobs and dedicates themselves to football to move up? Sign me up as a player and a fan. Every coach out there values W/L first and foremost, even Joe did. It is how they keep their jobs to be able to grow boys into men.

    MTayl72

  • Dan Mullen would be a tremendous hire. Many give him the credit for Urban Meyer's offense. If he can bring in or keep good defensive coaches, he will do just fine. Also, he is a top notch recruiter. At this point we can't do much better than him.

    PSULIONS17

  • PSULIONS17 said...

    Dan Mullen would be a tremendous hire. Many give him the credit for Urban Meyer's offense. If he can bring in or keep good defensive coaches, he will do just fine. Also, he is a top notch recruiter. At this point we can't do much better than him.

    Also - Who would know better how to recruit against O$U/Urban Meyer than a guy who worked under him for so many years?

    signature image

    BayernLion

  • PSULIONS17 said...

    Dan Mullen would be a tremendous hire. Many give him the credit for Urban Meyer's offense. If he can bring in or keep good defensive coaches, he will do just fine. Also, he is a top notch recruiter. At this point we can't do much better than him.

    Not sure why some think PSU can do better right now. PSU will be lucky if they get Mullen at this point in time.

    "One man didn't build this program and one man sure as hell cannot tear it down."

    LaJollaLion

  • BayernLion said...

    Also - Who would know better how to recruit against O$U/Urban Meyer than a guy who worked under him for so many years?

    And DM can take credit with data to back it up for the high powered offenses on UM's 2 national title teams when we go head to head with OSU for a recruit.

    beck881psu

  • LaJollaLion said...

    Not sure why some think PSU can do better right now. PSU will be lucky if they get Mullen at this point in time.

    Agree.

    PSULIONS17

  • PSULIONS17 said...

    Dan Mullen would be a tremendous hire. Many give him the credit for Urban Meyer's offense. If he can bring in or keep good defensive coaches, he will do just fine. Also, he is a top notch recruiter. At this point we can't do much better than him.

    As you said, the key is going to be bringing in or keeping our good defensive coaches.

    We're not going to beat Urban Meyer for Ohio recruits, but Tressel had Ohio on lockdown for the last ten years, so that isn't much of a change. I do believe Mullen is someone that could sell PSU to PA and mid-Atlantic recruits and go toe to toe with Brady Hoke and Brian Kelly.

    This post was edited by Cambria Nittany on 11/28/2011 at 9:08 AM

    Cambria Nittany

  • I dont kno if Dan Mullen isnt the best option in any circumstance.. There is only 1 Urban Meyer out there and he isnt coming here.. Now that being said there are a ton of open coaching positions and I'd bet Dan Mullen is on most schools list.. I think he would be a great hire and would fit the mold of the previous hires by the Univerisity..

    JTNITTANY

  • LaJollaLion said...

    Not sure why some think PSU can do better right now. PSU will be lucky if they get Mullen at this point in time.

    Agreed. We should jump all over this now before he signs an extension or is hired elsewhere!! He can go toe to toe with Meyer any day of the week. If we can get New Jersey back, keep control in Maryland, and put PA on lockdown we will be fine with recruiting.

    ...and if you're not down with that, then I got 2 words for ya.."suck it!!"

    paupacklion

  • PSULIONS17 said...

    Agree.

    Serious questions, was Mullen responsible for a lot of the recruiting success at Florida? I am not sure how the responsibilities fell between Urban, Mullen and Strong. \

    Looking at Mullen's last two classes at MSU, and knowing it is by no means an easy place to recruit too... but he has one 4* in the 2012 class, and one 4* in the 2011 class... both DT from MS. Maybe he is recruiting players to the system, but for having his offensive resume, I am surprised he hasn't recruited more offensive weapons to his system (especially considering I used rivals, and know their southern bias), I would think he'd have been more successful at pulling skill position players to Starksville.

    signature image

    NotoriousGMan

  • psu2013 said...

    Were not looking for Joe Pa v.2.

    As long as the next coach graduates his players and doesnt get us any NCAA sanctions then im ok with it.

    Hell, we might be getting sanctions because of Joe! What would everyone one say if thats the case.


    "At Penn State we hold ourselves to a higher standard. We will restore......."

    - This is what I've heard from the AD & BOT.

    This post was edited by Posas14 on 11/28/2011 at 9:21 AM

    Posas14

  • I have no interest in being Harvard or Northwestern Posas14.

    This post was edited by dwillforpres on 11/28/2011 at 9:29 AM

    dwillforpres

  • dwillforpres said...

    I have no interest in being Harvard or Northwestern Posas14.

    Agree. At the end of the day, I am all about football. Yes, I feel these kids should take advantage of their scholarships that they have earned, but the only reason I am on this board and even talk Penn State is because of football. I want a winner. We are kidding ourselves if we feel Joe was all over everything with these kids in the classroom. We have to find the balance, but from his track record Mullen appears to have that right balance. Let's get this done quickly so we can save the program.

    ...and if you're not down with that, then I got 2 words for ya.."suck it!!"

    paupacklion

  • I appreaciate "the succes with honor" but lets get off our high horse. The success has been debateable. Since 99 we have been a NC contedner once. Honor,the staff has been admirable in keeping away from NCAA recruiting infractions but the police blotter shows they are not all saints in the locker room. What makes you yhink Dan Mulen can't keep his NCAA nose clean. When you have 100+ 18 to 22 yrs old you are gonna have issues. I don't think we need an IVY league mentality to have REAL success with honor (keep it clean with the NCAA).

    The more I hear about Dan Mullen the more I like him.

    ajsocha

  • Posas14 said...

    If we can hold on to our defensive staff - I feel a little better about Mullen. But not really -

    I have 2 other names, that are likely flawed in PSU people's eyes -

    Skip Holtz - (Holtz is a bad name, I agree), but is he up to the job?

    Paul Rhodes - Coached at Pitt in 2000 (fatal flaw), but seems like a good guy in post game comments after OSU win. Always tough against Iowa.

    Definitely don't want Holtz. Think we can and will do better than Rhodes also.

    Sloepoke20

  • Posas14 said...

    If we can hold on to our defensive staff - I feel a little better about Mullen. But not really -

    I have 2 other names, that are likely flawed in PSU people's eyes -

    Skip Holtz - (Holtz is a bad name, I agree), but is he up to the job?

    Paul Rhodes - Coached at Pitt in 2000 (fatal flaw), but seems like a good guy in post game comments after OSU win. Always tough against Iowa.

    You think Mullen isn't a good candidate because you have a perception that he doesn't graduate players, doesn't have a good defense, and doesn't give good media interviews?

    He is coaching in one of the LEAST educated states in the country. Spend 15 minutes researching education in America and you will quickly see where Mississippi sits.
    He has only been at MSU for 3 seasons which means he is taking "credit" for someone else's recruits graduating.
    MSU sits in the middle of the SEC for football graduation rates, not great and horrid given the South's education levels. You are going to reject a LOT of coaches using your education requirements.

    MSU has defenses have been very good the last few years. Look at their scores against last year's national champ and this year's likely champ (that would be LSU). They play one of the toughest schedules in the nation year after year and they have a competitive defense w/ lower rated players . Leaps and bounds better than MSU under Croom. Mullen is the Ferentz of the SEC. He takes 2 and 3 star players and plays well against the top teams in the country.

    I couldn't care less about how he looks in an interview or press conference. How do his players, the coaches, and the recruits perceive him? Innovative offensive mind, great pedigree, and he isn't even 40 yet.

    If we settled for Skip or Rhodes I would be beyond disappointed.

    MSU Excels Among Peers In NCAA's Graduation Success Rate - Mississippi State University Bulldogs Official Athletic Site - mstateathletics.com

    STARKVILLE, Miss. - Mississippi State student athletes posted a 79 percent graduation success rate over the four-year period beginning in 2001, the NCAA announced today. The 79 percent marks the fourth-highest success rate in the Southeastern Conference.

    www.mstateathletics.com

    Scout.com: The Bootleg's 2010 Graduation Rate Analysis

    We often hear of the purported strength of various FBS (Division I-A) schools in terms of the academic support and life preparation they offer their “student-athletes”. In reality, many powerhouse football schools are downright shameful in their consistently demonstrated inability to graduate their players. Once again, we pull back the curtain with the newest data from the NCAA.

    stanford.scout.com

    helpdesk

  • helpdesk said...

    You think Mullen isn't a good candidate because you have a perception that he doesn't graduate players, doesn't have a good defense, and doesn't give good media interviews?

    He is coaching in one of the LEAST educated states in the country. Spend 15 minutes researching education in America and you will quickly see where Mississippi sits. He has only been at MSU for 3 seasons which means he is taking "credit" for someone else's recruits graduating. MSU sits in the middle of the SEC for football graduation rates, not great and horrid given the South's education levels. You are going to reject a LOT of coaches using your education requirements.

    MSU has defenses have been very good the last few years. Look at their scores against last year's national champ and this year's likely champ (that would be LSU). They play one of the toughest schedules in the nation year after year and they have a competitive defense w/ lower rated players . Leaps and bounds better than MSU under Croom. Mullen is the Ferentz of the SEC. He takes 2 and 3 star players and plays well against the top teams in the country.

    I couldn't care less about how he looks in an interview or press conference. How do his players, the coaches, and the recruits perceive him? Innovative offensive mind, great pedigree, and he isn't even 40 yet.

    If we settled for Skip or Rhodes I would be beyond disappointed.

    You guys need to stop bringing facts into the argument. It is all about feelings and 20 minute shows and one speech where he "pushed" a player out of the way for the University President. Don't you know anything about hiring a football coach? Geez.

    MTayl72