The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 636
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 972
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

Post a New Topic
Back to Topics
Sigs off
My boards ▾
Jump to a board I follow

You have no favorite boards.
Follow board
Follow board

Follow This Topic
5 votes needed to rate this Topic
Pages: 1 | Refresh

Freeh Report "Corrections"

- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

Looks like some of the "damning" evidence in the Freeh report is now being retracted.

Unknown Titlke

http://www.thefreehreportonpsu.com/Louis-Freeh-Report-on-Penn-State-ERRATA-SHEET.pdf
www.thefreehreportonpsu.com
mugatu11
- 5 stars
  Rating: 100
  14 votes total
- (136)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago via 247Sports Mobile

What a freakin joke
PSU_DG ●
- 5 stars
  Rating: 85
  602 votes total
- (528)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

You gotta be shitting me. This entire situation from the start back in November to it ongoing as we speak has been nothing shy of a big giant cluster F!
PSUjosh11 ●
- 5 stars
  Rating: 91
  3232 votes total
- (9512)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago via 247Sports Mobile

Why doesn't this surprise me?
pennstpete
- 5 stars
  Rating: 93
  198 votes total
- (444)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

Mistakes in regard to dates are completely unacceptable. As a journalism major, I hate bad editing. It is very inappropriate to make mistakes in a document of that nature. It is highly important material and gives the public an idea of carelessness.
PSUatw
- 5 stars
  Rating: 95
  473 votes total
- (1213)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

It just looks like very small detail corrections. Am I missing something?
rummel49
- 5 stars
  Rating: 92
  751 votes total
- (698)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago via 247Sports Mobile

Freeh probably asked for an extra $1 mil for proofreading
PSU_DG ●
- 5 stars
  Rating: 85
  602 votes total
- (528)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago via 247Sports Mobile

rummel49 said...
It just looks like very small detail corrections. Am I missing something?

'Schultz said' to 'Courtney said' is a big difference
Curley meeting with Sandusky in 2001 instead of 1998 is a big difference

This post was edited by PSU_DG on 7/24/2012 at 10:23 AM
PSU_DG ●
- 5 stars
  Rating: 85
  602 votes total
- (528)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

The dates are a bit of a screw up, but overall not that big a deal. Just my humble opinion.
bonovoxpsu
- 5 stars
  Rating: 89
  1148 votes total
- (1697)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

bonovoxpsu said...
The dates are a bit of a screw up, but overall not that big a deal. Just my humble opinion.

you're joking right? The dates are possibly one of the most important aspects of the report!
drken22
- 4 stars
  Rating: 75
  487 votes total
- (792)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

what a cluster F.....dates are critical to the findings and I think why NCAA vacated wins starting in 1998. Not sure if it would have resulted in changes to anything else, but this opens the door for additional scrutiny and questions regarding the accuracy of the report.
PSUPike ●
- 5 stars
  Rating: 93
  15 votes total
- (20)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

drken22 said...
you're joking right? The dates are possibly one of the most important aspects of the report!

yeah, weren't the dates what they tried to hang Joe on by saying he knew in 98 and it was a pattern in 2001?? F- you Freeh and double f- you to the NCAA for using this piece of shit report as the basis to crucify us. Seriously, if this thing gets shredded, do we not have any recourse to appeal these bullshit sanctions??
LinebackerU1
- 5 stars
  Rating: 96
  379 votes total
- (598)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

rummel49 said...
It just looks like very small detail corrections. Am I missing something?

First off, dates are dates. Those are as crucial as it gets. The mixing up of the shower incident tells you how important a date is.
Second, I think the severity of the mistakes is w/e. If you pay 6M for a report, there shouldn't be mistakes of any kind, let alone key dates.
PSUatw
- 5 stars
  Rating: 95
  473 votes total
- (1213)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

The date changes aren't quite as big as claiming Schultz REPLIED to an email that he did not know about the 1998 investigation instead of Courtney STATING she was not aware of the investigation. WTF man? That is one of the big "he perjured himself and is going to hell" parts of the document.
helpdesk
- 5 stars
  Rating: 95
  822 votes total
- (1461)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago

The Freeh report is full of inaccuracies and draws conclusions based on the flimsiest of evidence. It is very poorly done.
Nittany Sluggo
- 5 stars
  Rating: 89
  479 votes total
- (620)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Reply
- Quote
- Rate Up Rate Down
10 months ago via 247Sports Mobile

mugatu11 said...
Looks like some of the "damning" evidence in the Freeh report is now being retracted.

This is just outrageous. In a case where every word lost in translation could lead the national media on a new string of massive misperceptions, mistakes of this kind are entirely unacceptable. Heck i work for a management consulting firm who averages only $50k per engagement like this, yet we would be hung out to dry if we made this kind of error in our deliverables.
InfamousOne ●
- 5 stars
  Rating: 95
  180 votes total
- (66)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User