The Lions' Pride

I wouldn't characterize 6'2" as smaller. And the LB's on our roster were all from the previous staff (though I think Wartman is a good enough LB for either staff). Maybe the heights are off, but I wouldn't assume so. I can think of two LB's off the top of my head that the staff said "no" to because of height - the senior kid (George someone?) who visited for the Wisconsin game and John Kenny.

I just know that Sean specifically said before the staff wanted to make sure our LB's were tall enough.

His film is extremely jumpy on my end. Anyone else seeing the same thing?

I think he was referring to their weight. Most of the guys we are offering seem to be in the 215-220 lb range. That is smaller than our usual 230-235 lb range for LB. Reeder seems to be the one exception already at 230.

Would you like to know how many of our stud linebacker from the last decade were in the 230-235 range while they were high school recruits?

I understood your point, was talking about your "That is smaller than our usual 230-235 lb range for LB." statement.

No problem. Any LB recruit who is legitimately 6'1-6'2 and 210+ is plenty big and shouldn't have any problem playing in the 230-240 range in college.