-
wideout said...
The bad culture Freeh alludes to is partially false. Penn State had/has a great reputation for graduating its athletes; however, whether you think Paterno did enough or not, Spanier did not do enough and it can be inferred quite easily by outsiders that there was a culture of silence - which was not reporting the egregious acts meted out to these young and highly impressionable kids. To many people, that was unforgivable. As president, Spanier had the ultimate responsibility in this case to ensure that the authorities had all the information and that there were no errors in communication between the parties at Penn State and local authorities. Emmert's unilateral handling of the Penn State matter was unprecedented. He never should have forced Erickson to take his ultimatum, which essentially was death penalty of four years or sanctions. This was a criminal, not an NCAA matter. The entire Sandusky debacle is such an incredibly complicated legal case which can be parsed and interpreted in many different ways - depending upon your connections to Penn State. One thing is certain, Penn State was held to a standard never before used, while North Carolina will get away with gross academic fraud.
-
white_out said...
You're right about Spanier, but here's the kicker on that...
IT'S NOT AN ATHLETIC ISSUE, thus rendering the NCAA out of its jurisdiction. It's a Department of Education issue then.
This isn't, nor has it ever been an athletic department issue. The athletic department, and more specifically got slammed because Mark Emmerts very good friend Vicky Triponey, whom he had hired at UConn (What's their graduation rates for Basketball?) was a disgruntled former employee of Penn State.
I firmly believe, and no one will change my mind. Mark Emmert used his position to exact revenge for his friend, and show Penn State all about their culture, which Vicky Triponey said was out of whack.
-
white_out said...
You're right about Spanier, but here's the kicker on that...
IT'S NOT AN ATHLETIC ISSUE, thus rendering the NCAA out of its jurisdiction. It's a Department of Education issue then.
This isn't, nor has it ever been an athletic department issue. The athletic department, and more specifically got slammed because Mark Emmerts very good friend Vicky Triponey, whom he had hired at UConn (What's their graduation rates for Basketball?) was a disgruntled former employee of Penn State.
I firmly believe, and no one will change my mind. Mark Emmert used his position to exact revenge for his friend, and show Penn State all about their culture, which Vicky Triponey said was out of whack.
-
Hamilton Lion said...
Remember, this is the moron who presides over investigators who couldn't nail Auburn for buying Cam Newton where the trace of money could have been found by some six year old kid in Bangledesh and the same investigators who couldn't trace back all the fake grades for several student-athletes at UNC. No one at the NCAA is sharp enough to conduct investigations on their own, so they have to have someone else to do it.
-
Psu2011 said...
http://www.freep.com/article/20120921/SPORTS06/120921067/ncaa-mark-emmert-dave-brandon-michigan
I hate this guy..
"As for the criminal case against Sandusky, he said if the school had brought it forward in 1998 and separated itself at that time, the NCAA never would have been involved."
.. He obviously did NOT read the Freeh report.
Hamilton Lion
- 4 stars Rating: 76
4381 votes total - (7993)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars



Emmert spewing more nonsense