-
chezhoy said...
not a knock on your reply, but my thought regarding the season length: cut it (the postseason) down like they do for college basketball. I don't care if it's football, they don't need a week off...and they're not all out there every play. Hockey is just as physical (if not more) than football and they play more than one game a week. You could probably say the same for rugby.
-
DocAlan02 said...
I can't figure out why anyone cares about the bowls, honestly. In the current system, the only bowl that counts is the "championship" game. The rest mean no more than every other game on the schedule, when it comes down to it. Those teams haven't won anything other than a regular game. The point should be to have a true champion. The bowls can still exist anyway, for all the other teams. They won't mean any less than they mean now.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
-
BoulderFish
- 5 stars Rating: 89
1725 votes total - (1732)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
appoo said...
There's also a lot of years where we have multiple 1 loss teams, and multiple 2 loss teams. This past season we had LSU undefeated, Five1 loss teams, and a raft of 2 loss teams. It's like how do you pick from them?
I feel like the BCS doesn't even really understand why people dislike the BCS, or maybe they do, and just don't care. My guess is the latter.
-
MTayl72 said...
I think its pretty clear every year who the top 4 teams in college football are, for the most part. Granted it isnt always like that. Someone will always be left out, theres always going to be a cutoff and someone will bitch about it, look at the NCAA tourny. Cant include em all, thank God. The plus one system gives you the elite teams that year in college ball, and keeps the schedule reasonable without having to cut any home games, which cannot happen.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
-
appoo said...
I'm not even sure about knowing a top 4. Last year we had LSU & Alabama. After that you had a bunch of teams you could argue being deserving of that 4th team such as Okie State, Oregon, Boise State, Stanford, South Carolina and possibly even Wisconsin.
I think CBK works well because all conference champs get an invite, and the only teams you're cutting off are the ones who would be 9 - 12 seeds. Generally no one cares about them beyond a day. I'd like to see something similar to that in CFB. If you don't win your conference, and you don't finish in the next 5 after that in the BCS, you can't really complain about that.
I still believe this is simply about a couple of power conferences wanting to make sure smaller schools don't have easy access. They don't see upside in playing a dangerous MAC team in a playoff game.

Ditching a Playoff to Save the Rose Bowl (WSJ)