Considering the source I actually thought the comments weren't half bad. I did read it yesterday however, its possible it was overrun since then.
The comments were mostly courteous, but 75% were anti-PSU and anti-blog poster. The "you don't get it" crowd. Yes they were civil, but the gist was a repeat of the mainstream media narrative. In other words, the OP read the Freeh report and analyzed its opinions against the evidence presented and offered a different conclusion. Whereas the commentators ignored the OPs facts and regurgitated ESPNs anti-PSU narrative.
Best blogpost yet. Extremely well written