Online Now 1060

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 766
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 1081
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell and swap tickets

Reply

BOB wants to resurrect the Pitt rivalry ...

  • PSUJT$ said...

    Well first of all if BOB wants to do it then there must be a way to get it done b/c he would know more than anyone about how the schedule needs to be made to keep the school in good financial shape. Like I've stated before other schools have yearly out of conference rivals that they play and they don't seem to be going broke. If the 3rd most profitable college football can't afford to do it there's something wrong. If we played the Bama's/ND's/Texas's of the world more often I might agree with you but it seems like we get more of the Rutgers/Syracuse/Temples of the world then we get those schools. Also, playing around the country is great and all but how has that worked for schools like ND? They play around the country all the time and it hasn't helped them.

    So many things wrong here.

    1. What gives anyone the impression BOB has any idea what is needed for the athletic department financially? He has never once managed a budget let alone one that is in excess of $100 million. That's not a knock on him as how many college or pro coaches know how to do that? They coach, and very, very few run an athletic department while coaching anymore. Money for football covers the entire athletic department. Do you really think Bob knows how much money is need to run soccer, woman's baskeball, etc., methods to bringing in that money?

    2. There are a handful of schools who play major OOC rivalries on annual basis. FSU-UF, ND-USC, Stanford-ND, UM-ND, and thats about it. FSU-UF, well UF never plays anyone else OOC so a rivalry is easy. The others are all against ND who doesn't hav a conference schedule to worry about. All other rivalries are in conference which PSU and PItt are not.

    3. Temple gives us three home games for every road game, once Pitt agrees to that great we can play them. Rutgers actually has a better record then Pitt since 2005.

    4. ND wants to stay independent so it has no choice but to play around the country. The can't play just one conference or midwest schools because they would never be able to schedule an entire season or they would play four or five directional schools which NBC would never allow.

    5. A home game with 100,000 fans brings in well over $6,000,000 in ticket sales alone. I am not including concessions which is probably at least another million. Add parking, people buying gear down town that weekend which the university gets. Plus the more home games the more money the Big Ten Network gets because of advertising or ABC contracts. Road games pay less because the home team has TV control, that's why games at Temple were hard to get because it was MAC controlled.

    6. The new staff is costing alot more then the previous staff. As in a couple million more per year.

    You can play Pitt every year, as long as you don't ever want to play, 'Bama, UVA, ND, BC, Syracuse, Miami, USC, or Oregon St. Those are all schools we have played OOC since we last player Pitt.

    Give me a game against Texas, FSU, USC, that is great and gets us exposure. No one cares about Pitt and it costs way too much to the university financially.

    This post was edited by jmisdamina on 5/7/2012 at 3:56 PM

    jmisdamina

  • I would be okay with renewing the "rivalry" with Pitt if they agreed to play the next 30 games in Beaver Stadium. Otherwise, get lost, Pitt.

    PSUFlyers

  • Old Coaly said...

    “I would love to see that game played on an annual basis,” O’Brien told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review in a story published Saturday. “I have a tremendous amount of respect for (Pitt coach) Paul Chryst and their program, and that’s a great rivalry.

    Not sure I agree ... I remember the rivalry and it had some high points, but as a teenager in Pitt Stadium I was afraid for my life. Some real whacko's there as we all know.

    be careful, BO'B
    you may have bitten off more than you can chew.
    I remember Pitt ABSOLUTELY OWNING us for a period of time in the 80s & 90s.
    Im worried.

    B1G__Legend

  • B1G__Legend said...

    be careful, BO'B
    you may have bitten off more than you can chew.
    I remember Pitt ABSOLUTELY OWNING us for a period of time in the 80s & 90s.
    Im worried.

    Pitt did not own us....what games were you watching?

    psupartyman

  • psupartyman said...

    Pitt did not own us....what games were you watching?

    O$U troll no worries, nothing more to see there.

    Penn State 7x National Champs, home of the winningest college football coach to ever grace a sideline.

    NittanyEagles

  • Can we get an IP ban on this clown?

    EDIT: Deleted the quoted response.

    This post was edited by Andrew Dzurita on 5/8/2012 at 6:43 AM

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • Sparty should worry about not becoming little sister again in their own state rather than coming to our board.

    EDIT: Deleted the quoted response.

    This post was edited by Andrew Dzurita on 5/8/2012 at 6:43 AM

    Penn State 7x National Champs, home of the winningest college football coach to ever grace a sideline.

    NittanyEagles

  • NittanyEagles said...

    Sparty should worry about not becoming little sister again in their own state rather than coming to our board.

    I'm sure he's not an MSU fan. It's the same OSU fan just changed his name to make people think he's not an OSU fan.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • Wow classy! I hope the average Sparty fan is a better class of citizen than you.

    EDIT: Deleted the quoted response.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Andrew Dzurita on 5/8/2012 at 6:43 AM

    psupartyman

  • It's an osu fan. He did the same thing on our board.

    buttesnake