Online Now 402

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

On this Board 224
Record: 4947 (7/23/2012)

Online now 389
Record: 7381 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The Lions' Pride

Black shoes, basic blues. No names, all game

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell and swap tickets

Reply

2012 MLB Season Thread

  • Lang06 said...

    I'm not a Phil's fan, but this is ridiculous.

    That guy transformed the team and made those moves to get to the world series a couple of times and be, arguably the most consistent and best team in the national league for the last several years.

    The whole thing about who wouldn't have made that move ,,, fact is 30 teams didn't make that move or didn't seal the deal.

    The Lee deal back to Seattle ... they knew they weren't going to be able to sign him then, so they traded him away for what I presumed was the best offer at the time. Whatever he did worked since Lee wanted to come back to Philly when he entered free agency.

    I'll take it point by point. That guy transformed the team. NO, that was Pat Gillick. Everyone knows it.

    Sure, 30 teams didn't make that move. About 25 of those teams couldn't afford to make the move, nor would doc have accepted the trade to those teams as he had a full no-trade clause and was only willing to go to a contender. The only teams that could have pulled off the move were probably Anaheim/Boston/NY/Philly.

    The Lee move back to Seattle was a joke. If you think otherwise, you don't know enough about the situation. Amaro jumped on the first offer. Lee was a top 5 pitcher making 9 million dollars and Amaro jumped on offer #1, an offer that didn't even get Seattle's top prospects. How you can't get a top prospect for a top pitcher at 9 mil is called poor general managing. He could have played that bid off against other teams and gotten a better deal. It's plain and simple.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • BerneseMtDog said...

    His worst move may be resigning Jimmy Rollins. He's really leaking oil. Galvis looks like the real deal. They could have plugged him in at SS and used that 10 million per year to resign Cole Hamels. I know hindsight is 20/20, but I was all for them letting Jimmy go during the offseason.

    Disagree. I didn't like the resigning and still don't. But the market was terrible and he wasn't sure what he had in Galvis. If he lets Jimmy go, he's got nothing at shortstop this year and is completely banking on Utley coming back strong. What if Utley still doesn't come back or comes back at 50% of what he was? He could easily get reinjured.

    I do not like Jimmy and wish he could have been gone, but at least there were other variables to consider here that make it less desperate than the Howard deal and the Lee deal. At least Jimmy only got 3 years instead of the 5 he was looking for. 5 would have been a pathetic move. And the 4th year option would be a struggle to reach if Galvis continues to play well.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • shavisimo2 said...

    I'll take it point by point. That guy transformed the team. NO, that was Pat Gillick. Everyone knows it.

    Sure, 30 teams didn't make that move. About 25 of those teams couldn't afford to make the move, nor would doc have accepted the trade to those teams as he had a full no-trade clause and was only willing to go to a contender. The only teams that could have pulled off the move were probably Anaheim/Boston/NY/Philly.

    The Lee move back to Seattle was a joke. If you think otherwise, you don't know enough about the situation. Amaro jumped on the first offer. Lee was a top 5 pitcher making 9 million dollars and Amaro jumped on offer #1, an offer that didn't even get Seattle's top prospects. How you can't get a top prospect for a top pitcher at 9 mil is called poor general managing. He could have played that bid off against other teams and gotten a better deal. It's plain and simple.

    Ok, I didn't realize that they said the Lee to Seattle was the first offer and that there were better deals out there. I also didn't consider that the GM of the Phillies would not play the bid off against other teams to get a better deal.

    How many teams were willing to trade their future star(s) for one year of Cliff Lee ... knowing that only a few teams could actually afford him once he hit free agency? Your Halladay argument needs to be considered in the Lee to Seattle scenario. Other thing to note is that Aumont and Ramirez were considered to have as good a future as Pineda at the time.

    My overall assumption is that if you aren't happy with the product over the last several years you will never be happy or satisfied .... no matter the GM. Maybe I'm mistaken, but the Phillies sucked in the early to mid 2000's and for a large part of their history. This guy made the moves and played the hands he was dealt and it resulted, one way or another, in a couple world series appearances, a championship, gained revenue, built excitement, expectations, and a team that has been a mainstay at the top of the NL for last four or five years.

    No GM is flawless, and truth be told those prospect deals sometimes work out and other times don't. How is Lastings Milledge, Phil Hughes, or Justin Smoak doing ... then you have guys like Austin Jackson and Ian Kennedy who were thought to be of lesser talent and they have done much better than expected.

    If winning was easy even losers would do it.

    Lang06

  • Lang06 said...

    Ok, I didn't realize that they said the Lee to Seattle was the first offer and that there were better deals out there. I also didn't consider that the GM of the Phillies would not play the bid off against other teams to get a better deal.

    How many teams were willing to trade their future star(s) for one year of Cliff Lee ... knowing that only a few teams could actually afford him once he hit free agency? Your Halladay argument needs to be considered in the Lee to Seattle scenario. Other thing to note is that Aumont and Ramirez were considered to have as good a future as Pineda at the time.

    My overall assumption is that if you aren't happy with the product over the last several years you will never be happy or satisfied .... no matter the GM. Maybe I'm mistaken, but the Phillies sucked in the early to mid 2000's and for a large part of their history. This guy made the moves and played the hands he was dealt and it resulted, one way or another, in a couple world series appearances, a championship, gained revenue, built excitement, expectations, and a team that has been a mainstay at the top of the NL for last four or five years.

    No GM is flawless, and truth be told those prospect deals sometimes work out and other times don't. How is Lastings Milledge, Phil Hughes, or Justin Smoak doing ... then you have guys like Austin Jackson and Ian Kennedy who were thought to be of lesser talent and they have done much better than expected.

    The Halladay argument only lightly works in. Most of the 30 teams could afford that 1 year at 9 mil instead of the 15.75 Halladay was making in the year the Phillies acquired him. Second, Lee didn't have a no trade clause in his contract. So the trades are considerably different situations.

    Also, I never said I wasn't happy with the product. It's been great to have a winner in town, especially after growing up on the Terry Francona Phillies. But that doesn't mean I cannot be critical. He's been a below average GM and I'd say his ratio of successful moves to unsuccessful moves is worse than most GM's. The difference is the Phillies have a 172 million dollar payroll, so the margin for error is much wider. You know this as an Orioles fan, the GM has much less room for error in Baltimore, just as the GM in Pittsburgh has even less room for error than in Baltimore.

    The payroll + Pat Gillick has masked Amaro's GM ability.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • Yea, my point with the lee trade was that few teams would be willing to get rid of their top guys go one year ... Knowing that only a handful could actually afford him long term. It's not the one year at nine million ... It's the 5 at 20 teams shied away from.

    I agree that money covers the mistakes, but I believed in and was happy with a lot of moves that Andy mcaphail made over the last few years. I understood the purpose was to build the farm system and fill in the major league holes with one year guys. I think the phillies was to use the frm system to gain MLB stars. No team can have it both ways ya know. If it could happen the Yankees would have their current lineup and the royals farm system.

    Thanks for reminding me I'm an O's fan haha ... It is seriously the main reason I can't relate to your opinion and struggle with that mindset. It's basically been a lifetime of losing for me.

    If winning was easy even losers would do it.

    Lang06

  • Yeah, I understand it's a balance and that it's tough to relate. I just know there are multiple moves he made that looked horrible at the time of the signing and only got worse, that's the sign of poor management. If you make a move that looks good and doesn't work out, I won't really pass judgment. When you make moves that look bad at the time and they end up panning out poorly, that's where I have a problem.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • Pirates fans, what do y'all think of Shelby Ford? Is he solid?

    I know he was recently released because of some hamstring problem, but he was supposed to be pretty good before this all went down.

    Any chance he could get another shot somewhere? Is he deserving?

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • For the Phillies fans, it appears as though Vance Worley will be back in the starting rotation on Monday. He had yet another bullpen session today that went very well. I read he threw the ball well, with good velocity, and reported no soreness, etc. This is huge considering Halladay is out indefinitely.

    signature image

    PSUjosh11

  • PSUjosh11 said...

    For the Phillies fans, it appears as though Vance Worley will be back in the starting rotation on Monday. He had yet another bullpen session today that went very well. I read he threw the ball well, with good velocity, and reported no soreness, etc. This is huge considering Halladay is out indefinitely.

    And just voted one of the most underrated pitchers in baseball by the players. Good week for Vance

    chasfcd11

  • Sad day. Mets no hiterless streak of 50+ years has ended. Congrats johan

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • Woohoo! Let's Go Mets! So pumped for Johan!

    yalikeMoxie

  • shavisimo2 said...

    Sad day. Mets no hiterless streak of 50+ years has ended. Congrats johan

    It took 50 years and a blown call.

    BerneseMtDog

  • BerneseMtDog said...

    It took 50 years and a blown call.

    It's the Mets dude, just let them have it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • Texas Lion said...

    Pirates fans, what do y'all think of Shelby Ford? Is he solid?

    I know he was recently released because of some hamstring problem, but he was supposed to be pretty good before this all went down.

    Any chance he could get another shot somewhere? Is he deserving?

    He was a third round pick but really never showed much of that promise. He was constantly injured. He was supposed to have a good bat but honestly that didn't really show like it should. IMO the Pirates gave him a plently long look. Being 27 I would think he probably gets another chance.

    Sloepoke20

  • Fuckin whorish umpires.

    MTayl72

  • Sloepoke20 said...

    He was a third round pick but really never showed much of that promise. He was constantly injured. He was supposed to have a good bat but honestly that didn't really show like it should. IMO the Pirates gave him a plently long look. Being 27 I would think he probably gets another chance.

    Thanks.

    He's a TCU boy, and was a stud in college. He's back in town now, I was curious to see if he was for real.

    How come the Pirates have drafted so terribly over the past ten years? Bad scouts? Or the owner isn't willing to pay the money for top picks?

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • MTayl72 said...

    Fuckin whorish umpires.

    Typical Cards fan.... biggrin

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • Texas Lion said...

    Thanks.

    He's a TCU boy, and was a stud in college. He's back in town now, I was curious to see if he was for real.

    How come the Pirates have drafted so terribly over the past ten years? Bad scouts? Or the owner isn't willing to pay the money for top picks?

    Recently under Neal Huntington the Pirates have done very well in the draft. He has had 4 drafts and we have spent more money on the first year player draft than any other team over that span. Ownership realized that the only way to compete with big markets is spend money on scouting, player development and the draft.

    The previous regime, with Dave Littlefield as GM and Kevin McClatchey as majority owner was a complete joke. They refused to spend money on anything. Drafted low ceiling prospects because they knew they could sign them on the cheap, put little money into scouting or player development, had no presence in Latin America. It was a sad state of affairs and set the organization back.

    IMO the organization is heading in the right direction now. MLB, however is trying to once again f*ck the Pirates by putting in hard slot guidelines for signing drafted players. Which is a total joke. They will let teams spend ridiculous amounts of money on free agents and not say a word but as soon as a small market finds a way to maybe even the playing field slightly MLB steps in.

    Sloepoke20

  • The new CBA agreement is bullshit, and was made to protect teams like LA, NY, Boston, and even Philly to a certain extent.

    The Rangers got to where they are now because of good scouting, especially Latin America, and great player development. Two straight pennants from a team that's not supposed to do that, and they change the rules up to favor the big boys.

    It won't hurt us as badly as y'all, because we're set to has a new media deal that's supposed to be gigantic, but it's still frustrating. Limiting spending on Latin American players? Are you censored kidding me? Why the hell would they do that?

    The new CBA is bullshit, plain and simple. The Yanks (and all big market teams) are butthurt that they're getting their ass kicked in October by better run teams than theirs, and suddenly the rules of the game change to where it benefits their organization's style.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • On another note, I'm getting frustrated with the Rangers play as of late.

    I know we're going to turn it around, and that we're a damn good team and still have the second best record in baseball, but my goodness do I hate losing to the Angels. They just keep creeping back closer and closer. A series win would be very nice, but I'm not sure if we can do it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • Phillies lose 4 in a row after Cliff Lee strikes out 12 but allows a two run double in the bottom of the 8th. Phillies lose 2-1 to the Dodgers.

    signature image

    PSUjosh11

  • PSUjosh11 said...

    Phillies lose 4 in a row after Cliff Lee strikes out 12 but allows a two run double in the bottom of the 8th. Phillies lose 2-1 to the Dodgers.

    Not sure why Charlie ran him over 120 pitches when he clearly was throwing straight junk in the 8th. The double pitch was terrible, but I'm not sure why he was even in there. If it weren't for two throws out at 3rd, that inning could had 4+ runs. Charlie blew this one, again.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • Sloepoke20 said...

    Recently under Neal Huntington the Pirates have done very well in the draft. He has had 4 drafts and we have spent more money on the first year player draft than any other team over that span. Ownership realized that the only way to compete with big markets is spend money on scouting, player development and the draft.

    The previous regime, with Dave Littlefield as GM and Kevin McClatchey as majority owner was a complete joke. They refused to spend money on anything. Drafted low ceiling prospects because they knew they could sign them on the cheap, put little money into scouting or player development, had no presence in Latin America. It was a sad state of affairs and set the organization back.

    IMO the organization is heading in the right direction now. MLB, however is trying to once again f*ck the Pirates by putting in hard slot guidelines for signing drafted players. Which is a total joke. They will let teams spend ridiculous amounts of money on free agents and not say a word but as soon as a small market finds a way to maybe even the playing field slightly MLB steps in.

    I will sit back and wait before saying Neal has done very well drafting. He is loading up with arms. This is where the Pirates failed miserably with Littlefield. Benson (bust regardless), JVB (should have been a hitter), Clinton Johnson (same thing), Maholm (garbage), Bullington (awful), Moskos (ridiculous pick), Bradley (injured), Burnett (never did anything) were all failures. The organization has done a poor job at developing.

    We have already seen Stetson Allie be moved to third because he couldn't throw strikes. Maybe this is where he should have been all along. Whether Cole and Tallion become studs is something I can't answer. It looks like that punk the Pirates selected first yesterday - Appel, is already whinning. I say, don't offer him a contract at all ... let him go back into the draft next year - a stronger and deeper draft and hope a Matt Harrington free fall happens to him. He should be thankful he was drafted, instead, he pouts.

    Guys need to develop before I give Neal credit.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Hamilton Lion on 6/5/2012 at 10:02 PM

    Hamilton Lion

  • shavisimo2 said...

    Not sure why Charlie ran him over 120 pitches when he clearly was throwing straight junk in the 8th. The double pitch was terrible, but I'm not sure why he was even in there. If it weren't for two throws out at 3rd, that inning could had 4+ runs. Charlie blew this one, again.

    Forget Charlie....enough is enough with this offense. It's atrocious. They are so inconsistent!

    signature image

    PSUjosh11

  • PSUjosh11 said...

    Forget Charlie....enough is enough with this offense. It's atrocious. They are so inconsistent!

    The offense is what it is. You can't change it. It's been poor for 2.5 years and it's on Amaro. The signs have been there and he has made some crucial mistakes. But that has nothing to do with why Cliff was throwing at around 125 pitches when it was painfully obvious his stuff wasn't there and the only way he was recording outs was fluky throws out at third.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2