Online Now 769

Final grades: Offense

From a puzzling and disappointing opening loss to Ohio to a satisfying overtime defeat of Wisconsin, the 2012 Penn State team usually made things entertaining. In his first season at the helm, Bill O'Brien got contributions from veterans and rising stars at most positions throughout the course of the season. Today, Lions247 awards final grades to each position and examines what they meant to the team as a whole. Part I will grade the offense, while Part II will take a look at the defense and special teams.

Zach Zwinak

A big second half by Zach Zwinak gave the Nittany Lions' running back grade a boost.

Quarterbacks -- A-


Midseason Grade -- A-

Matt McGloin put up one of the finest statistical seasons by a Penn State quarterback and, just as importantly, was a leader on the field for an offense that had only two returning starters and just three other seniors in the lineup this season. McGloin's decision-making and accuracy improved this season and his ability to get the Nittany Lions in the right play was crucial in Bill O'Brien's offense and a product of McGloin's knowledge of that offense. He threw a couple of bad interceptions and took a few bad sacks, and wasn't as sharp down the stretch as he had been in the middle part of the season, but for the most part was one of Penn State's most consistent and productive players, and did so from the most important position. True freshman Steven Bench, the only other Nittany Lion to see action under center, gets an "incomplete" because he played so little.

Running backs -- B+


Midseason Grade -- B

Of all the breakout players on the 2012 Penn State team, Zach Zwinak might be the most compelling. The powerful but soft-spoken sophomore went from the nether regions of the depth chart to a player who averaged 147 yards over the final four games, against arguably the toughest part of the schedule. Zwinak's north-south style and ability to get yards after contact were huge and his pass protection was solid, though his tendency to cough up the ball was concerning. Senior Michael Zordich provided energy and some power running of his own when Zwinak needed a break as Bill Belton, Derek Day and Curtis Dukes drifted out of the spotlight late in the season.

Wide receivers -- B+


Midseason Grade -- B

Sophomore Allen Robinson had a sensational season, leading the Big Ten in catches, receiving yards and touchdown receptions. His ability to make plays one-on-one and get yards after the catch complemented the coaches' ability to find different ways to get him the ball quite nicely. Junior Brandon Moseby-Felder took advantage of Shawney Kersey's departure to become a reliable No. 2 who made 25 catches over the final seven games. Slot receiver Alex Kenney closed the year with five catches in the last three games, though he wasn't featured for the bulk of the season. True freshman Trevor Williams did some good things with the limited targets he received. Stan Hixon's group got open, caught the ball, blocked downfield and gave McGloin options on almost every play.

Tight ends -- A-


Midseason Grade -- A-

Penn State's wide receivers likely would have had more impressive numbers if the tight ends hadn't been so involved, but the big guys were just as productive, particularly around the end zone. Kyle Carter, the smallest of the bunch at 6-foot-3, would have likely given teammate Deion Barnes a run for his money as Big Ten Freshman of the Year had he not missed three games with injuries but still finished second on the team with 36 catches. Former walk-on Matt Lehman and freshman Jesse James used their size, hands and deceptive speed to make big plays all over the field and combined for eight touchdown catches. Garry Gillliam did most of his work as a blocker but was productive when the ball was thrown his way. O'Brien, coach John Strollo and this group changed the way tight ends will be used at Penn State and were a major part of what made the offense go.

Offensive line -- B+


Midseason Grade --B-

With five solid starters and a few players rotating in and out of the lineup, Penn State's front five ranged from holding its own to taking it to opponents. Teams usually needed to blitz McGloin to bring him down (and many of the quarterback's sacks were on him, not his blockers) and the Nittany Lions' running game steadily improved from the first game to the last. Penn State had some issues with holding and some early missed assignment troubles but was communicating very well by season's end. Matt Stankiewitch and John Urschel were reliable and steady on the inside, senior Mike Farrell was somewhat of a pleasant surprise at right tackle and also filled in admirably when Donovan Smith, who was very impressive in his first season of action, was injured on the left side. Mac McWhorter did a nice job of getting players like Ty Howle, Angelo Mangiro, Adam Gress and Eric Shrive experience in meaningful spots, which kept his starters fresh and should help put the line ahead of schedule for 2013.

Jeff Rice
    • 2 Returning starters from last year....

      Makes hat BOB did even more amazing.

      arch1102

    • I feel like Kyle Carter's contributions can't be understated. Yeah, his numbers look good but he was also a go-to guy on 3rd downs and consistently came up with conversions.

      I'd say the unit I was most disappointed with was the OL. They opened some holes in the running game, but overall was a bit worse than I expected. They deserve some time, though, with another offseason in the S&C program and now a lot of starters returning.

      psubills62

    • psubills62 said...

      I feel like Kyle Carter's contributions can't be understated. Yeah, his numbers look good but he was also a go-to guy on 3rd downs and consistently came up with conversions.

      I'd say the unit I was most disappointed with was the OL. They opened some holes in the running game, but overall was a bit worse than I expected. They deserve some time, though, with another offseason in the S&C program and now a lot of starters returning.

      I told you it wasn't a one year process Bills. I think a B+ is pretty good, I would have said B. Finishing and consistency overall is what they need to work on. But hell, this was with 4 new starters.

      MTayl72

    • MTayl72 said...

      I told you it wasn't a one year process Bills. I think a B+ is pretty good, I would have said B. Finishing and consistency overall is what they need to work on. But hell, this was with 4 new starters.

      While you were more right than I was...I never said it wasn't a one year process. I thought it would take at least a couple years too, but thought the effects would be seen much sooner.

      psubills62

    • MTayl72 said...

      I told you it wasn't a one year process Bills. I think a B+ is pretty good, I would have said B. Finishing and consistency overall is what they need to work on. But hell, this was with 4 new starters.

      i expect next years line to be among the best in the conference if not the country.

      a full year in a new strength program, and another year with mac whose reputation clearly was earned

      white_out

    • psubills62 said...

      While you were more right than I was...I never said it wasn't a one year process. I thought it would take at least a couple years too, but thought the effects would be seen much sooner.

      what? what were you expecting? We were one of the worst units in the B1G in 2011 (IMO) and consistently we thrashed B1G opponents up front in 2012. Iowa, Wisconsin (best rushing D in the B1G was worn down by Zwinak pounding it at them all day), Illinois, etc. we just physically beat up. Something we haven't seen from an OL in years. How was that not immediate improvement? McWhorter doesn't exactly have a ton of studs to work with either. He turned players that wouldn't crack a 2-deep anywhere in the country into serviceable guys (Farrell, Gress, Shrive). They weren't great, but to say the effects of the changes weren't shown is crazy. Not to mention, our unit seemed to get stronger as the year went on.

      PSU12

    • psubills62 said...

      While you were more right than I was...I never said it wasn't a one year process. I thought it would take at least a couple years too, but thought the effects would be seen much sooner.

      I think the effects were definitely seen. Sure, they might not have lived up to the lofty expectations that many of us had, but there is no way on God's green earth the/this OL would have been half as good as it was under the previous regime.

      BoulderFish

    • I thought the oline was really good, considering what they were doing. Early in there year we were substituting like mad (I'm not sure if we did it as much down the stretch of the season). We saw 9-10 oline per game. Who else does that? And of course you're going to see issues pop up when you do that.

      I thought their play against Wisconsin was the high water point for them. Just an excellent effort. ZZ almost hitting 180 against them? Just awesome.

      bonovoxpsu

    • PSU12 said...

      what? what were you expecting? We were one of the worst units in the B1G in 2011 (IMO) and consistently we thrashed B1G opponents up front in 2012. Iowa, Wisconsin (best rushing D in the B1G was worn down by Zwinak pounding it at them all day), Illinois, etc. we just physically beat up. Something we haven't seen from an OL in years. How was that not immediate improvement? McWhorter doesn't exactly have a ton of studs to work with either. He turned players that wouldn't crack a 2-deep anywhere in the country into serviceable guys (Farrell, Gress, Shrive). They weren't great, but to say the effects of the changes weren't shown is crazy. Not to mention, our unit seemed to get stronger as the year went on.

      As vslice mentioned in a previous thread, our adjusted running numbers were down from 4.6 YPC in 2011 to 4.2 YPC in 2012.

      Wisconsin was a good game for the OL, but other games were not. Got zero push against OSU and not much against other teams we should have creamed (Indiana, for one, NW, Illinois).

      psubills62

    • I had forgotten we had so few Off starters back after Brown and Silas departed. WOW. Kudos to this staff.... kudos.

      carlisle14

    • psubills62 said...

      As vslice mentioned in a previous thread, our adjusted running numbers were down from 4.6 YPC in 2011 to 4.2 YPC in 2012.

      Wisconsin was a good game for the OL, but other games were not. Got zero push against OSU and not much against other teams we should have creamed (Indiana, for one, NW, Illinois).

      that number also comes from Matt McGloin taking at least 1-2 15 yard sacks a game. Regardless, you don't need to look at the numbers to know our OL drastically improved from last year and improved since the start of the season alone drastically....with a bunch of crap and a couple good ones really. Obviously it took them awhile to get going and they stunk in the Ohio/VA games, but i'd argue if we had even Zwinak running the ball against VA instead of Derek Day we get a ton more production. If you watch the game, the holes were there....Day couldn't find them. Fact of the matter is, we physically wore teams down in B1G play like I haven't seen since '08 with a considerably less talented (and young) group.

      PSU12

    • PSU12 said...

      that number also comes from Matt McGloin taking at least 1-2 15 yard sacks a game. Regardless, you don't need to look at the numbers to know our OL drastically improved from last year and improved since the start of the season alone drastically....with a bunch of crap and a couple good ones really. Obviously it took them awhile to get going and they stunk in the Ohio/VA games, but i'd argue if we had even Zwinak running the ball against VA instead of Derek Day we get a ton more production. If you watch the game, the holes were there....Day couldn't find them. Fact of the matter is, we physically wore teams down in B1G play like I haven't seen since '08 with a considerably less talented (and young) group.

      No it didn't. Adjusted means adjusted for things like sacks.

      They had games where they did well, but they struggled more so late in the year than I thought they would.

      psubills62

    • QB: B+ (no way he gets an A with some of the critical interceptions he threw in our toughest B1G games)
      RB: B- (they need to get better. period. ZZ was solid, but Belton was a big disappointment and we had no one else)
      WR/TE: A- (you can thank our two best young pass catchers in years for this grade)
      OL: B (had their moments, but also got beat up pretty good at times)

      Lots of room for improvement, and I expect that we'll see big strides next year.

      leftcoastlion

    • The key to our entire season was keeping McGloin healthy...our OL played a huge role in that and for that reason I give them an A!

      Can you imagine how our season would have gone if we lost McGloin?

      I know we had some significant injuries, but I think we have to be very thankful this team stayed as healthy as it did.

      JoeMatterno

    • Coming into the season, the OL was one of the biggest question marks with Stank being the only returning starter. Over the course of the 12 game season, I thought this unit developed into a solid unit that adapted very well to the offensive scheme that OB was operating. In the running game, they excelled with the power running backs that ran between the tackles. When plays were called to the outside, the backs were unable to find room. In the passing game, same thing, the quick hitters, three-five step drops helped make it easier to keep McGloin clean, but when they went with 5-7 step pocket passing game, the sacks and blitz pickup problems surfaced. Considered a weakness coming into this season they will be a strength next season and should be considered one of the better units in the conference, if not country. Coach Mac deserves a lot of credit for his impact on this area of the offense.

      NitneeNut

Already have an account? Sign In

Add a comment
Want to be involved in the discussion? Start Free Trial